LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/bundi-zila-petrol-pump-dealers-association-bundi-vs-sanyojak-bundi-zila-petrol-mazdoor-sangh-b-m-s-20190212/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Bundi Zila Petrol Pump Dealers Association Bundi vs Sanyojak Bundi Zila Petrol Mazdoor Sangh(B.M.S.)

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
12 February 2019
Case No.
Civil Appeal Nos.2784-2785 of 2009
Result
Allowed
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari
Citation
[2019] 2 S.C.R. 717 : 2019 INSC 179
Supreme Court Reports [2019] 2 S.C.R. 717 : 2019 INSC 179
Headnote

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 – s.10(1) – State Government made reference u/s.10(1) of the Act to Industrial Tribunal to decide the various demands raised by the respondent – Industrial Tribunal decided the reference ex parte against the appellant – Writ petition by appellant – Single Judge of the High Court allowed the writ petition – Writ appeal by the respondent – Division Bench of High Court allowed the appeal of respondent in the absence of appellant – Review petition was also dismissed – On appeal, held: Since inception, appellant did not get opportunity to contest the matter because they did not have any knowledge of the proceedings – Every party to a lis has a right to contest the case on merits, subject to certain exceptions provided in law – Thus, case remanded to the Industrial Tribunal.

Allowing the appeals, the Court

HELD: 1. The reasons for remand are: First, it is not in dispute that the appellant did not get any opportunity to contest the reference before the Industrial Tribunal and had to suffer adverse award ex parte; Second, the cause shown for their absence before the Industrial Tribunal constitutes a sufficient cause and entitles the appellant to claim an opportunity to contest the reference on merits; Third, this is not a case where the appellant appeared before the Tribunal and thereafter stopped appearing and proceeded ex parte. In other words, since inception, the appellant did not get any opportunity to contest the matter because they did not have any knowledge of the proceedings; Fourth, every party to a lis has a right to contest the case on merits, of course, subject to certain well known exceptions provided in law. However, so far as the appellant’s case is concerned no such exception is noticed, which may disentitle them to contest the reference on merits; and lastly, substantial justice demands that having regard to the controversy, which is subject matter of reference, both the parties to the lis are entitled for an opportunity to contest the case on the merits. It is for all these reasons appeals are allowed and the case remanded to the Industrial Tribunal. [Paras 9 and 10][720-F-H; 721-A]

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 21.11.2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in D.B. Civil Special Appeal No.449 of 1999 whereby the Division Bench of the High Court allowed the appeal filed by the respondent herein and the order dated 10.04.2007 whereby the review petition filed by the appellant herein was dismissed. 2. A few facts need mention hereinbelow in brief to appreciate the controversy involved in these appeals. 3. On 26.07.1989, t
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →