LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/bhagwan-das-goel-dead-through-a-his-lrs-ors-vs-pyare-kishan-agarwal-20190404/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Bhagwan Das Goel (Dead) through a His Lrs. & Ors. vs Pyare Kishan Agarwal

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
4 April 2019
Case No.
Civil Appeal No.3399 of 2019
Result
Allowed
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari
Citation
[2019] 6 S.C.R. 457 : 2019 INSC 464
Supreme Court Reports [2019] 6 S.C.R. 457 : 2019 INSC 464
Headnote

Arbitration Act, 1940:

s. 20 – Application for appointment of arbitrator – In terms of arbitration clause in the partnership deed – Preliminary objection as to maintainability of the application on the ground that the same was barred u/s. 69(3) of Partnership Act as it was an unregistered partnership – Courts below held that the application was maintainable – On appeal, held: Matter remitted to High Court for deciding the issue keeping in view law laid down in *Krishna Motor Service case – Partnership Act, 1932 – s.69(3).

Allowing the appeal, the Court

HELD: High Court did not decide the issue, which was the subject matter of the writ petition, keeping in view the law laid down by this Court in the case of *Krishna Motor Service case. Therefore, the matter should be remitted to the High Court for deciding the writ petition afresh on merits keeping in view the law laid down by this Court in the case of *Krishna Motor Service. [Paras 12 and 14][459-E; G] Krishna Motor Service by its Partners v. H.B. Vittala Kamath (1996) 10 SCC 88 : [1996] 1 Suppl. SCR 594 – referred to.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the final judgment and order dated 14.05.2012 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ C. No.14839/1993 whereby the High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellants herein and upheld the order dated 18.03.1993 passed by the Civil Judge, Jhansi in O.S. No.140/1992. 3. A few facts need mention hereinbelow for the disposal of this appeal, which involves a short point. 4. The appellants are the legal representatives of the original defendants
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →