LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/bank-of-india-ors-vs-pankaj-srivastava-20240430/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Bank of India & Ors. vs Pankaj Srivastava

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
30 April 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 6837 of 2023
Result
Dismissed
Bench
J.K. Maheshwari, Sanjay Karol
Citation
[2024] 5 S.C.R. 1305 : 2024 INSC 538
Acts & Sections
Constitution
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 5 S.C.R. 1305 : 2024 INSC 538
Issue for consideration
Whether there is relevant material on record that could be construed as contemplation of the disciplinary proceedings against the deceased employee which would prima facie result in award of major penalty, and thereby bar the Respondent’s claim for compassionate appointment.
Headnote

Compassionate Appointment – No relevant material to contemplate that the initiation of disciplinary proceedings would lead to prima facie award of major penalty prior to the death of the deceased employee:

Held: 1. Upon reviewing Clause 10(iv) of the Scheme prevalent for for grant of compassionate appointment vide Branch Circular No. 92/64 dated 17.03.1999 and the amended directions from the bank’s Board Meeting on 20.06.2002, it is clear that even if disciplinary proceedings against an employee were pending or under contemplation at the time of their death, which could prima facie lead to a major penalty, the dependents of the deceased employee are still not entirely excluded from consideration for compassionate grounds and it was subject to government approval. [Paras 6, 8, 9]

2. The court further noticed that the deceased employee was not placed under suspension, initiation, or contemplation of the disciplinary proceedings before his death and the chargesheet was also not issued. It is merely said that the chargesheet was under preparation. Therefore, in absence of any relevant material disclosed it cannot be presumed to be case of prima facie award of major penalty on account of contemplation of disciplinary proceedings. Claim for appointment of Respondent on compassionate ground directed to be considered by the Petitioner. [Paras 9, 10]

Keywords: Service Law · Disciplinary proceedings · Compassionate Appointment

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Himanshu Rai, Hony. Associate Editor (Verified by: Liz Mathew, Sr. Adv.). Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order 1. Being aggrieved by the judgment of Single Bench, allowing the writ petition of the respondent and directing the bank to consider his claim for appointment on compassionate ground; confirmed in appeal by the Division Bench, this appeal has been preferred. 2. The facts in shorn are, the respondent filed a writ petition seeking directions to consider his case being eligible and grant compassionate appointment on the post of Clerk with immediate effect on account of death of his father during course of employment. Prayer was also made to quash the order dated 20.06.2002 issued by the ba
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →