LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/baby-sakshi-greola-vs-manzoor-ahmad-simon-and-another-20241211/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Baby Sakshi Greola vs Manzoor Ahmad Simon and Another

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
11 December 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 14290 of 2024
Result
Allowed
Bench
Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, K.V. Viswanathan
Citation
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 958 : 2024 INSC 963
Acts & Sections
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 12 S.C.R. 958 : 2024 INSC 963
Issue for consideration
Appellant (a minor at the time of the accident) sustained grievous injuries and suffered disability and moderate mental retardation. MACT awarded compensation of Rs.5,90,750/- with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition. High Court granted a further amount of Rs.5,60,000/- with interest at 9% per annum from the date of filing till realization. Appellant sought further enhancement of the compensation.
Headnote

Motor Vehicle Accident – Appellant sustained grievous injuries in a road traffic accident when she was 7 years old and suffered disability and moderate mental retardation – Compensation awarded – Enhancement of:

Read the full headnote (1 more paragraph)

Held: Even though the Doctor (PW-3) on assessment of the appellant opined that the disability suffered by her was 75%, however, the disability of the appellant should be treated to be 100% for all practical purposes – Taking notional income is not the correct approach – Instead, the minimum wages payable to a skilled workman in the concerned State has to be taken into consideration because, that would be the minimum amount which the appellant would have earned on becoming a major – The minimum wage payable to a skilled workman in the State of Delhi at the time of the accident, i.e. 02.06.2009, was Rs. 4,358/- per month – To arrive at the compensation to be awarded under the head of loss of income and earnings due to disability, 40% added for future prospects and a multiplier of 18 applied in view of the age of the appellant – Therefore, the compensation under loss of income/earning capacity would be Rs. [4,358 + (40% of 4,358)] x 12 x 18 = Rs.13,17,859/-, rounded off to Rs. 13,18,000/- – Further, the appellant will remain dependant on another person for the rest of her life even though the physical age will increase, but her mental age will be that of a child studying in the 2nd Standard/Class – High Court only enhanced the compensation under the head of pain and suffering from Rs.50,000/- as awarded by the Tribunal to Rs.1,00,000/- which is not commensurate to the impact the unfortunate accident has on the appellant and her family – In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, compensation of Rs.15,00,000/- award under the head of pain and suffering – Also, the compensation awarded under the head of loss of marriage prospects by the High Court is inadequate and is enhanced to Rs. 5,00,000/- – Rs.9,42,000/- awarded under the head of attendant charges as the appellant would be dependent on a skilled attendant throughout her life and on a full-time basis – Compensation awarded under Future Medical Treatment enhanced to Rs.5,00,000/- as the appellant would be requiring medical assistance in the form of medicines, diapers, etc. to live a relatively comfortable life – Impugned judgment quashed and set aside – Total compensation of Rs. 50,87,000/- with 9% rate of interest awarded. [Paras 27, 29, 31, 33, 38, 40, 43, 46, 48, 49, 51, 53]

Keywords: Motor vehicle accident · Road traffic accident · Compensation · Enhancement · Minor at the time of the accident · Grievous injuries · Moderate mental retardation · Disability · 100% disability · Disability Certificate · Mental disability · Physical disability · Multiplier · Dependent · Minimum wages · Skilled worker · Notional income · Loss of income and earning capacity · Future prospects · Physical age · Mental age · Child studying in the 2nd Standard/Class · Pain and suffering · Loss of marriage prospects

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Divya Pandey. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment B.R. Gavai, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. The present appeal calls into question the correctness and validity of the final judgment and order passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi dated 7th November 2017 in MAC. APP. 1107/2011. 3. The appellant had approached the High Court seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded on account of injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Central District, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “Tribunal”) had by a judgment and order dated 13th June 2011 awarded compensation of R
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →