LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/ashok-kumar-ors-vs-the-state-of-jharkhand-ors-20180514/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Ashok Kumar & Ors. vs The State of Jharkhand & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
14 May 2018
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 877 of 2018
Bench
Jasti Chelameswar, Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Citation
[2018] 7 S.C.R. 765 : 2018 INSC 495
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 7 S.C.R. 765 : 2018 INSC 495
Headnote

Jharkhand Judicial Service (Recruitment) Rules, 2004 – rr.21,

22 and 27 – In Judgment dated 11.5.2018 titled Ashok Kumar & Ors. v. State of Jharkhand and reported in [2017] 7 SCR 755, paragraphs 25 and 26 stand deleted – Further paragraph 27 to be read as “the respondent will ensure that the differential mandatory benefits including increments are remitted to the appellants within a period of three months from the date of the order” .

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following Order of the Court was passed: ORDER On the matter being mentioned, the learned counsel for the parties stated that there may not be necessity of a direction as contained in paragraphs 25 and 26 of the judgment passed by this Court on 11.5.2018, which accordingly stand deleted. They further plead that paragraph 27 of the said judgment may be read as under: “The respondent will ensure that the differential mandatory benefits including increments are remitted to the appellants within a period of three months from the date of the order.” Ordered accordingly. Devika Gujral Modif
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →