LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/tilak-raj-vs-state-of-himachal-pradesh-20250110/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Tilak Raj vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Date
10 January 2025
Case No.
Cr.MP(M) No. 1462 of 2024
Bench
Justice Ranjan Sharma
Acts & Sections
Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 §483 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §20 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §29 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §52-A Motor Vehicles Act §181 CrPC §161
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioner, Tilak Raj, who had been in custody since 19.05.2023, filed a petition under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail arising out of FIR No. 98 of 2023 registered at Police Station Baijnath, District Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, under Sections 20 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and Section 181 of the Motor Vehicles Act. The prosecution alleged that 1.509 kg of Charas-Cannabis was recovered from underneath the driver's seat of a vehicle in which the petitioner was seated as driver near Jagarkot Ajay Pal Devta Temple.

The petitioner contended that he was falsely implicated and that the entire contraband was not made homogenous as required under Section 52-A of the NDPS Act, and consequently only 26 grams as per the RFSL Report could be attributed to him, making it an intermediate quantity and not a commercial quantity. The petitioner also contended that the pendency of another FIR could not be a ground for prolonging his incarceration.

The State opposed bail through its Status Report, stating that investigation was complete and the challan had been presented before the learned ASJ Palampur. The Court considered the submissions of both sides in the context of the NDPS Act provisions governing bail and the nature of the quantity allegedly recovered.
Catchwords: bail · NDPS Act · Charas · narcotic drugs · commercial quantity · intermediate quantity · Section 52-A · homogenization · Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita · regular bail · false implication · Motor Vehicles Act

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 64, Cited by 0] Himachal Pradesh High Court ____________________________________________________________ vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 10 January, 2025 ( 2025:HHC:2996 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No. 1462 of 2024 Reserved on: 4th January 2025 Announced on: 10th January, 2025 ____________________________________________________________ Tilak Raj .......Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ......Respondent Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? Yes For the petitioner: Mr. Vijender Katoch, Advoca
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All HP HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →