Headnote
AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioner, Tejinder Singh, filed a criminal revision before the Himachal Pradesh High Court challenging the judgment dated 30.11.2021 passed by the learned Sessions Judge (Forests), Shimla, which had upheld the judgment dated 28.8.2015 of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No. 6, Shimla. The case arose from a complaint that the accused, Govinder Singh, had purchased two parcels of agricultural land in Village Durgapur, Tehsil Suni, District Shimla, by fraudulently annexing fabricated Krishak Praman Patras (agriculturist certificates) dated 13.11.2007 and 10.6.2008 to sale deeds dated 10.4.2008 and 24.6.2008, in contravention of Section 118 of the H.P. Tenancy and Land Reforms Act.
The prosecution case was that the accused Govinder Singh, not being a bona fide agriculturist and having no land in the areas mentioned in the Krishak Praman Patras, conspired with co-accused Kahan Chand and others to fabricate the certificates to enable the purchase of agricultural land. Investigation revealed that the Patwar Circles mentioned in the certificates did not contain the villages named therein, and the patwaris purportedly issuing the certificates denied doing so. Forensic examination of handwriting and seal impressions was conducted, and a charge sheet was filed against the accused for offences under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468, and 471 IPC against Govinder Singh and under Sections 120-B, 201, 467, and 468 IPC against Kahan Chand.
The present revision arose from the concurrent findings of both the Trial Court and the Appellate Court. The High Court examined the matter on the basis of the extensive evidence led by the prosecution, including the testimony of 28 witnesses and documentary exhibits relating to sale deeds, Krishak Praman Patras, revenue records, FSL reports, and recovery memos.
Catchwords:
Criminal revision · fabrication of documents · Krishak Praman Patra · agriculturist certificate · land purchase · Section 118 H.P. Tenancy and Land Reforms Act · cheating · forgery · criminal conspiracy · Indian Penal Code · sale deed · Himachal Pradesh · forensic examination · handwriting · patwari
Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's
judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.
Full Judgment Text
[Cites 70, Cited by 0]
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Reserved On: 28.6.2025 vs Govinder Singh And Another on 8 July, 2025
2025:HHC:21728
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr. Revision No. 293 of 2022
Reserved on: 28.6.2025
.
Date of Decision: 08.07.2025
Tejinder Singh ...Petitioner
Versus
Govinder Singh and another ...Respondents
Coram
Hon'ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 Yes.
For the Petitioner : Mr. R.L. Sood, Senior Advocate,
with Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate.
For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Ajay Kochhar, Senior
Advocate,
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools.
For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.