LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/shambhu-lal-meena-vs-state-of-himachal-pradesh-20250325/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal

Shambhu Lal Meena vs State Of Himachal Pradesh

Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Date
25 March 2025
Case No.
Cr.MP(M) No. 287 of 2025
Bench
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §15 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §29 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §37 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita §483 IPC §116
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioner, Shambhu Lal Meena, who had been in custody since 14.09.2023, filed a petition for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) in connection with FIR No. 148 of 2023 registered under Sections 15 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act) at Police Station Majra, District Sirmour, Himachal Pradesh. The case arose from the interception of a vehicle on 14.09.2023, from which 54.402 kg of Poppy Straw/Chura Post was recovered from the dicky of a White Creta Hyundai Car in which the petitioner was a passenger along with three other accused persons.

The petitioner contended that no contraband was recovered from his exclusive and conscious possession, that he had no prior criminal antecedents, that he was only 22 years of age, and that he had been in incarceration for over one year and six months. The State opposed the bail application, pointing out the commercial quantity of contraband involved, the gravity of the offence under the NDPS Act, and the fact that trial was ongoing with 29 prosecution witnesses yet to be examined.

The Court examined the statutory provisions of Sections 15 and 29 of the NDPS Act, noting the stringent punishment prescribed for offences involving commercial quantities of poppy straw and the rigorous conditions attached to the grant of bail in such matters under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
Catchwords: bail · NDPS Act · poppy straw · commercial quantity · Section 15 NDPS Act · Section 29 NDPS Act · Section 483 BNSS · conscious possession · regular bail · narcotic drugs

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 52, Cited by 0] Himachal Pradesh High Court Announced On: 25.03.2025 vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 25 March, 2025 2025:HHC:7555 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No. 287 of 2025 Announced on: 25.03.2025 ____________________________________________________________ Shambhu Lal Meena .......Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ......Respondent Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? No For the petitioner: Mr. Kulwant Singh Gill, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Pranay Pratap Singh, Additional Advocate
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All HP HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →