LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/sanjay-agarwal-vs-the-union-of-india-and-ors-20240716/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Revenue · Reportable judgment

Sanjay Agarwal vs The Union Of India And Ors

Court
Bombay High Court
Date
16 July 2024
Case No.
Writ Petition No.1202 of 2022 with Interim Application (L) No.9504 of 2023
Bench
Nitin Jamdar J, Abhay Ahuja J
Acts & Sections
Customs Act, 1962 §17 Customs Act, 1962 §18(2) Customs Act, 1962 §47
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioner, a private individual, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking mandamus directing customs authorities to investigate alleged massive undervaluation and mis-declaration of material particulars in the import of luxury cars by private respondents (Mercedes-Benz, Skoda Auto Volkswagen, and BMW India), purportedly resulting in large-scale evasion of customs duty. The petitioner had earlier approached the Supreme Court in WP (Crl.) No. 20 of 2016, pursuant to which the apex court in July 2016 directed the petitioner to submit relevant documents before the Additional Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, Mumbai, with a further direction that appropriate action be taken if the information was found credible. Despite compliance, the petitioner alleged continued inaction by the authorities.

The Supreme Court, vide order dated 29th March 2023, held that the petitioner had locus standi and directed the Bombay High Court to consider and decide the writ petition on its merits without entering into the question of locus. The petitioner sought declarations that SVB orders and orders of assessment and clearance of goods for home consumption obtained by the private respondents under Sections 17, 18(2) and 47 of the Customs Act, 1962 were obtained by material suppression, fraud and misrepresentation, and were therefore void ab initio, relying on A.V. Papayya Sastry v. Government of A.P., (2007) 4 SCC 22.

The High Court, comprising Nitin Jamdar and Abhay Ahuja JJ., proceeded to hear the writ petition on merits in accordance with the Supreme Court's direction, examining questions relating to the role of Special Valuation Branch, customs duty valuation of related-party imports, and the alleged inaction of revenue authorities in pursuing what the petitioner characterised as credible information of large-scale customs duty evasion in the luxury car import segment.
Catchwords: Customs duty evasion · luxury car imports · undervaluation · mis-declaration · related party transactions · Special Valuation Branch · mandamus · Directorate of Revenue Intelligence · locus standi · void ab initio · SVB orders · Customs Act 1962 · home consumption clearance · writ jurisdiction

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 37, Cited by 0] Bombay High Court Sanjay Agarwal vs The Union Of India And Ors on 16 July, 2024 Bench: Nitin Jamdar, Abhay Ahuja 2024:BHC-OS:10938 WP-1202-2022-IAL-9504-23-23072024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1202 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.9504 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1202 OF 2022 SANJAY AGARWAL Age :-52 years, Resident At : 1001, Brindavan Terraces, Deonar Farm Road, Deonar, Mumbai-4000 088. )...PETITIONER V/s. 1. UNION OF INDIA, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Bombay HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →