LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/purba-sherpa-vs-state-of-himachal-pradesh-20250110/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal · Reportable judgment

Purba Sherpa vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Court
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Date
10 January 2025
Case No.
Cr.MP(M) No. 1737 of 2024
Bench
Justice Ranjan Sharma
Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §20 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §52-A Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 §483 CrPC §161
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioner, Purba Sherpa, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, arising out of FIR No. 72 of 2023 registered at Police Station Bhunter, District Kullu, Himachal Pradesh, for an offence under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The petitioner had been in custody since 26 April 2023 following recovery of approximately 4.04 kg of Cannabis/Charas from him after a police nakka was laid based on prior information.

The petitioner contended that he was innocent, that no incriminating material was recovered from him, and raised a procedural discrepancy regarding the Inventory prepared under Section 52-A of the NDPS Act, which bore a date of seizure of 19 December 2022 whereas the FIR was registered on 26 April 2023. The State, in its Status Report, maintained that the recovery was effected in accordance with the codal formalities, that the FSL report confirmed the substance to be Cannabis/Charas, and that the Challan had been filed before the District Judge, Kullu on 28 July 2023, with trial proceedings underway.

The Court examined the statutory provisions under Section 20 of the NDPS Act, noting the graduated punishment structure for small, intermediate, and commercial quantities, and proceeded to consider the parameters for grant of bail as laid down by the Supreme Court and the mandate of the BNSS, with the judgment being approved for reporting.
Catchwords: bail · NDPS Act · cannabis · charas · commercial quantity · Section 20 NDPS Act · Section 52-A NDPS Act · Section 483 BNSS · narcotic drugs · inventory discrepancy · regular bail · Himachal Pradesh

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 63, Cited by 0] Himachal Pradesh High Court Decided On : 10Th January vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 10 January, 2025 2025:HHC:2998 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr.MP(M) No:1737 of 2024 Decided On : 10th January, 2025 __________________________________________________________ Purba Sherpa ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh ...Respondents Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? Yes For the petitioner : Mr. Kamal Kant Chandel, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Hemant K. Verma, Deputy Advocate Gene
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All HP HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →