Headnote
AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioner, working as Administrative Officer in the Office of the Chief Architect, Odisha, challenged the order dated 19.10.2023 passed by the Principal Secretary, Works Department, rejecting his representation seeking revocation of the suspension order dated 14.12.2022 placed upon him while initiation of disciplinary proceedings under Rule 15 of the Odisha Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1962 was under contemplation. The petitioner also sought quashing of the order dated 07.12.2023 appointing an Inquiring Officer under Rule 17 read with Rule 15(4) of the said Rules to inquire into charges of showing undue favour to a third party employee, deliberately disobeying government orders, and misinterpreting orders of the Promotion Adalat.
The factual matrix disclosed that the petitioner had placed before the Chief Architect files pertaining to regularisation of one Sri Tapan Kumar Patra's officiating promotion, consequent upon which an order granting deemed promotion was issued on 13.04.2022 and subsequently cancelled on 29.04.2022. A show cause notice dated 22.06.2022 was thereafter issued to the petitioner and three other employees alleging gross misconduct, dereliction of duty, causing wrongful pecuniary loss to the Government, and violation of the Odisha Government Servants' Conduct Rules, 1959, while a matter involving Sri Patra was sub judice before the High Court.
The petitioner had earlier approached this Court in W.P.(C) No.30112 of 2023, wherein this Court directed the Principal Secretary to consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 09.01.2023 within ten days. The impugned order dated 19.10.2023 rejecting the said representation and the subsequent order appointing an Inquiring Officer formed the subject matter of challenge in the present writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
Catchwords:
suspension · disciplinary proceedings · government servant · undue favour · dereliction of duty · gross misconduct · Odisha Civil Services Classification Control and Appeal Rules · Promotion Adalat · regularisation · officiating promotion · writ petition · service law
Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's
judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.
Full Judgment Text
[Cites 17, Cited by 0]
Orissa High Court
Pabitra Matia vs State Of Odisha on 20 August, 2024
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.41425 of 2023
In the matter of an Application under Articles 226 and 227
of the Constitution of India, 1950
***
Pabitra Matia
Aged about 57 years
Son of Late Bhanua Matia
at present working as
Administrative Officer
Office of the Chief Architect
Nirman Soudh, Bhubaneswar,
District: Khordha. ... Petitioner.
-VERSUS-
1. State of Odisha,
Represented through
Principal Secretary to Government
of Odisha, Works Department,
Lok Seva Bhawan,
S
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools.
For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.