LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/sandeep-k-vs-the-indian-council-of-agriculture-research-icar-ors-20260220/ · Printed 11 Jul 2026
Service Matters

Sandeep K vs The Indian Council Of Agriculture Research (ICAR) & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
20 February 2026
Case No.
OP (CAT) No. 20 of 2026
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice P. V. Balakrishnan
Acts & Sections
Constitution §227 Central Administrati §19
Headnote AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
The petitioner, son of a deceased employee of ICAR-CPCRI who died in service in 2011, challenged an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench, which rejected his claim for compassionate appointment on the grounds of inordinate delay and his failure to secure sufficient marks in the selection process.

The High Court of Kerala reiterated the settled legal position that compassionate appointment is an exception to the general rules of recruitment and is not a vested right. It is intended solely to tide over the sudden financial crisis faced by the family of a deceased government employee at the time of death, and cannot be claimed after the passage of a reasonable period or once the immediate crisis has subsided.

Relying on precedents including Umesh Kumar Nagpal v. State of Haryana (1994) 4 SCC 138 and Santosh Kumar Dubey v. State of U.P. (2009) 6 SCC 481, the Court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the delay of approximately 13 years in approaching the Tribunal was unjustified, and that the petitioner's case had been duly considered on multiple occasions but he failed to secure adequate marks compared to other candidates, and accordingly dismissed the Original Petition.
Catchwords: compassionate appointment delay laches Central Administrative Tribunal ICAR OBC Group-C post financial crisis bread-winner selection criteria marks-based selection vested right service law

© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.

Full Judgment Text

```json { "title": "Sandeep K vs The Indian Council Of Agriculture Research (ICAR) & Ors.", "case_number": "OP (CAT) No. 20 of 2026", "side": "service", "date_of_judgment": "2026-02-20", "bench": "Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari and Justice P. V. Balakrishnan", "reportable": false, "parties_petitioner": "Sandeep K.", "parties_respondent": "The Indian Council of Agriculture Research (ICAR) represented by its Secretary, The Director ICAR-CPCRI Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, and The Head ICAR-CPCRI Regional Station Krishnapuram", "result": "dismissed", "head
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

More SC — Service Matters