LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/manoj-singh-negi-vs-ruchi-20240220-2/ · Printed 11 Jul 2026
Civil

Manoj Singh Negi vs Ruchi

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
20 February 2024
Case No.
MAT.APP.(F.C.) 58/2023, MAT.APP.(F.C.) 139/2023, MAT.APP.(F.C.) 142/2023
Result
Disposed
Bench
Rajiv Shakdher, Amit Bansal
Acts & Sections
Hindu Marriage Act, §25 Hindu Marriage Act, §27
Headnote AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
These are cross-appeals filed before the Delhi High Court against an order dated 17.10.2022 passed by the Principal Judge, South-East, Family Courts, Saket, New Delhi, on an application moved by the wife under Sections 25 and 27 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking permanent alimony and return of properties/stridhan. The Family Court had directed the husband to pay a lump sum permanent alimony of Rs. 6,00,000/- within six months and a monthly sum of Rs. 5,000/- to the wife until she is legally entitled to receive the same.

During the pendency of the appeals, it was brought to the notice of the High Court that although interim maintenance of Rs. 10,000/- per month had been paid during the divorce proceedings, no amount had been paid to the wife since the impugned order was passed, and no interim direction had been issued by the Court in the appeals.

The High Court directed that pending the appeals, the husband shall pay at least the monthly amount of Rs. 5,000/- as fixed by the impugned order, along with arrears, before the 10th day of March 2024, and listed all connected appeals for hearing on 23.04.2024.
Catchwords: permanent alimony stridhan Hindu Marriage Act interim maintenance cross-appeals matrimonial appeals family court monthly maintenance pendente lite relief

© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 2, Cited by 0] Delhi High Court - Orders Manoj Singh Negi vs Ruchi on 20 February, 2024 Author: Rajiv Shakdher Bench: Rajiv Shakdher, Amit Bansal $~11,12 & 13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 58/2023, CM APPL. 9660/2023 MANOJ SINGH NEGI ..... Appellant Through: Mr A.K. Mishra and Ms Sweeta Singh, Advocates. versus RUCHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms Nidhi Mohan Parashar and Mr Vikrant Kumar, Advocates. + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 139/2023, CM APPL. 25737/2023 MANOJ SINGH NEGI ..... Appellant Through: Mr A.K. Mishra and Ms Sweeta Singh, Advocates.
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

More SC — Civil