LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/porto-emporios-shipping-inc-vs-indian-oil-corporation-limitedr-anr-20250509/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Civil

Porto Emporios Shipping Inc vs Indian Oil Corporation Limitedr & Anr

Court
Delhi High Court
Date
9 May 2025
Case No.
CS (OS) 549/2021, I.A. 13976/2021, I.A. 15279/2021 and I.A. 15281/2021
Bench
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Acts & Sections
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 §5 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 §8
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The plaintiff, Porto Emporios Shipping Inc., a Liberian company, entered into a Charterparty agreement dated 05.08.2020 with Indian Oil Corporation Limited (defendant no.1) for the carriage of 273,317 MT of crude oil from Mina Al-Ahmadi, Kuwait to Paradip, India. An explosion and fire occurred on the vessel on 03.09.2020, following which the plaintiff notified defendant no.1 on 14.10.2020 that the Charterparty was frustrated. Defendant no.1 filed a lawsuit in Panama seeking USD 78 million, and the plaintiff filed a limitation of liability suit before the Panamanian court and separately contested continuation of arbitration proceedings initiated by defendant no.1 before the Indian Council of Arbitration.

The plaintiff filed the present suit for declaration and perpetual injunction before the Delhi High Court, contending that the arbitration agreement had become inoperative due to defendant no.1's repudiatory breach in invoking the jurisdiction of the Panamanian courts. Defendant no.1 filed an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking reference of the dispute to arbitration, contending that the suit was barred by Section 5 of the 1996 Act, which prohibits judicial intervention in matters governed by Part I of the Act, and that the arbitration clause mutually agreed upon by the parties could not be unilaterally waived.

The court was called upon to determine whether the institution of proceedings before foreign courts by defendant no.1 amounted to a repudiation of the arbitration agreement, thereby rendering it inoperative, and whether the plaintiff's suit for declaration and injunction was maintainable in light of Section 5 and Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Catchwords: Arbitration · Charterparty · Maritime dispute · Crude oil transportation · Frustration of contract · Repudiatory breach · Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 · Section 5 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 · Judicial intervention · Anti-suit injunction · Limitation of liability · Foreign proceedings · Panama courts · Indian Council of Arbitration · Declaration and injunction suit

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Filed under

Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 102, Cited by 0] Delhi High Court Porto Emporios Shipping Inc vs Indian Oil Corporation Limitedr & Anr on 9 May, 2025 Author: Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav Bench: Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav $- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV + CS (OS) 549/2021, I.A. 13976/2021, I.A. 15279/2021 and I.A.15281/2021 Between: - PORTO EMPORIOS SHIPPING INC., THROUGH ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY MR. ANIL SHAMRAO JADHAV REGISTERED OFFICE: 80 BROAD STREET, MONROVIA, LIBERIA ....PLAINTIFF (Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Delhi HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →