LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/isha-foundation-vs-google-llc-ors-20260319/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil

Isha Foundation vs Google LLC & Ors

Court
Delhi High Court
Date
19 March 2026
Case No.
CS(OS) 957/2024
Result
Disposed
Bench
Subramonium Prasad J.
Acts & Sections
CPC §Order VII Rule 11 CPC §Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The Plaintiff, Isha Foundation, a registered Public Charitable Trust founded by Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev, filed a suit seeking permanent injunction and damages against Google LLC (owner of YouTube), a Tamil weekly magazine Nakkheeran, and its Publisher/Editor, alleging that eleven defamatory videos uploaded on YouTube channels 'Nakkheeran TV' and 'Nakkheeran Neo' maligned the image of the Trust, its Founder, and its followers. The suit sought removal of the offending content, restraint on future publication, and damages of Rs. 3 crore against Defendants 2 and 3.

The Court was called upon to dispose of two interlocutory applications: I.A. No. 31798/2025 filed by Defendants 2 and 3 under Order VII Rule 11 CPC seeking rejection of the plaint on grounds of lack of territorial jurisdiction and want of authorization for filing the suit, and I.A. No. 30090/2025 filed by the Plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 CPC seeking ad-interim injunction. Following settled law, the Court first addressed the jurisdictional objection raised by the defendants before proceeding to examine the merits of the injunction application.

The Court noted that it is trite law, as affirmed in Asma Lateef v. Shabbir Ahmad (2024) 4 SCC 696, that a specific objection to jurisdiction must be considered before evaluating the merits of an interim injunction application. The judgment proceeded to examine the averments raised by Defendants 2 and 3 challenging the maintainability of the plaint before the Delhi High Court.
Catchwords: defamation · injunction · YouTube · online platform · intermediary liability · territorial jurisdiction · rejection of plaint · Order VII Rule 11 CPC · ad-interim injunction · trust · religious organisation · Tamil magazine · social media

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 23, Cited by 0] Delhi High Court Isha Foundation vs Google Llc & Ors on 19 March, 2026 Author: Subramonium Prasad Bench: Subramonium Prasad * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 19th MARCH, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF: I.A. 30090/2025 & I.A. 31798/2025 IN + CS(OS) 957/2024 ISHA FOUNDATION .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Simranjeet Singh, Ms. Pushpaveni Kakkaje, Mr. Jagdish Solanki, Mr. Rohan Jaitley, Ms. Meherunnisa A. Jaitley, Mr. Areeb Amanullah, Mr. Rishabh Pant, Mr. Abhijeet Kr. Pandey and Ms. Apurbaa Dutta, Advoca
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Delhi HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →