LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/lamba-auto-electric-pvt-ltd-earlier-vs-sh-tarandeep-singh-and-anr-20240920/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Criminal

Lamba Auto Electric Pvt Ltd Earlier ... vs Sh Tarandeep Singh And Anr

Court
Delhi High Court
Date
20 September 2024
Case No.
CRL.M.C. 761/2023 and CRL.M.A. 2913/2023
Bench
Manoj Kumar Ohri
Acts & Sections
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 §138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 §141 CrPC §251
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioners sought quashing of a complaint filed under Sections 138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, arising out of the dishonour of three cheques totalling Rs.80,00,000/- drawn on Canara Bank, Vikas Puri, Delhi. The cheques were issued by respondent No.2 allegedly as the authorised signatory of petitioner No.1 company in connection with a buy-back return plan related to investment in a residential colony project. The petitioners contended that they were neither signatories to the cheques nor held the bank account jointly with respondent No.2, and that the cheques were drawn on respondent No.2's personal account.

The Court examined the scope of Section 138 and Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and held that Section 138 can only be attracted against the person who draws the cheque on an account maintained by them. Section 141, which provides for vicarious liability of directors, applies only where the offence under Section 138 has been committed by a Company. Since the subject cheques were issued from respondent No.2's individual account and not from the company's account, the petitioners could not be held vicariously liable under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the NI Act.

Reliance was placed on the Supreme Court decision in Mainuddin Abdul Sattar Shaikh v. Vijay D. Salvi, (2015) 9 SCC 622, wherein it was held that if a cheque is drawn by an employee of an accused company on his personal account, even if to discharge dues of the company and its directors, the company and its directors cannot be held liable under Section 138 NI Act. The Court further noted that NI Act proceedings are quasi-criminal and in personam in nature, requiring strict construction of its provisions, and that there is no concept of shared liability under the Act.
Catchwords: Negotiable Instruments Act · dishonour of cheque · Section 138 · Section 141 · vicarious liability · directors · personal account · company account · quashing of complaint · authorized signatory · in personam · strict construction

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Filed under

Cheque dishonour (Section 138 NI Act)

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 10, Cited by 0] Delhi High Court - Orders Lamba Auto Electric Pvt Ltd Earlier ... vs Sh Tarandeep Singh And Anr on 20 September, 2024 Author: Manoj Kumar Ohri Bench: Manoj Kumar Ohri $~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 761/2023 and CRL.M.A. 2913/2023 LAMBA AUTO ELECTRIC PVT LTD EARLIER KNOWN AS KARMIC INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Vipin Bhasker, Advocate versus SH TARANDEEP SINGH AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Vipin Nandwani, Advocate for respondent No.1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI ORDER % 2
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Delhi HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →