LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/the-superintendent-of-post-offices-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-of-central-tax-20240710/ · Printed 22 Oct 2026
Revenue

The Superintendent Of Post Offices vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Central Tax

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
10 July 2024
Case No.
Writ Petition Nos. 10434, 4844, 4845, 5081, 8063, 5167, 5170, 6343, 8377, 5542, 5688, 8724, 8753, 6138, 8734, 7448, 7449, 7486, 7927, 8888 & 8597 of 2
Result
Disposed
Bench
Justice G. Narendar and Justice Kiranmayee Mandava
Acts & Sections
Constitution §226 Constitution §14 Finance Act, 1994 §73(1) Finance Act, 1994 §73(2) Finance Act, 1994 §78(1) Finance Act, 1994 §77(1)(a)
Headnote AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
These batch writ petitions were filed by various Superintendents of Post Offices and Postmasters in Andhra Pradesh under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Orders-in-Original issued by Service Tax authorities confirming demands of Service Tax inclusive of cesses on taxable services viz. Courier Agency Service, Insurance Auxiliary Service and Business Auxiliary Service provided during the period from 01.04.2014 to 30.06.2017 under Section 73 of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 174 of the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioners also challenged the imposition of penalties under Sections 78(1), 77(1)(a) and 77(2) of the Finance Act, 1994 read with Section 174 of the CGST Act, 2017 for non-registration and non-filing of ST-3 returns.

The petitioners contended that the impugned orders were illegal, arbitrary, high-handed and violative of the principles of natural justice as well as Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The demands related to services rendered by the Department of Posts, a government department, and the petitioners sought quashing of the orders-in-original along with interim relief by way of suspension of the impugned orders and restraint against coercive steps by the respondents pending disposal of the writ petitions.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amravati, comprising a Division Bench of Justice G. Narendar and Justice Kiranmayee Mandava, heard the batch matters together given the common questions of law and fact involved relating to levy of service tax on postal services rendered by the Department of Posts during the pre-GST regime.
Catchwords: Service Tax Department of Posts Courier Agency Service Insurance Auxiliary Service Business Auxiliary Service Order-in-Original Finance Act 1994 CGST Act 2017 Section 73 Section 78 Section 77 penalty non-registration ST-3 returns Article 226 Writ of Mandamus natural justice Article 14 government department pre-GST regime

© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 33, Cited by 0] Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati The Superintendent Of Post Offices vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Central ... on 10 July, 2024 _ ee ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) ~ WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR 'PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION Nos. 10434, ag4d, 428, 5081, 8063, 5167, 5170, 6343, 8377, 5542, 5688, 8724, 8753, 6138, end, 8734, ne, 7448, 7449, 7486, 7927, 8888 & &597 OF 2024 Wo.No.10434 of 2034: Beiween: 1. The Serior Superintendent of Post Offices, Praka
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

More SC — Revenue