LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/the-state-of-tamil-nadu-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-anr-20260202/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Constitutional · Reportable judgment

The State of Tamil Nadu vs The State of Karnataka & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
2 February 2026
Case No.
Original Suit No. 1 of 2018
Result
Disposed
Bench
Vikram Nath
Citation
[2026] 2 S.C.R. 285 : 2026 INSC 113
Acts & Sections
Constitution Supreme Court Rules, 2013 Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956
Supreme Court Reports [2026] 2 S.C.R. 285 : 2026 INSC 113
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to dispute as regards the sharing of the waters of the Pennaiyar River between the State of Tamil Nadu and the State of Karnataka.
Headnote

Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956 – ss.3, 4 – InterState River Pennaiyar – Dispute as regards the sharing of the waters of the Pennaiyar River and arising from the alleged construction of a check dam/diversion by the State of Karnataka-defendant-State on the said river, impeding the free flow of water, thereby depriving the State of Tamil Nadu-plaintiff-State of the benefits of the river waters flowing through the territories of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka and thereafter into Puducherry – Suit by the plaintiff-State against defendant-State and the Union of India seeking declaration that the said unilateral action of the defendant-State, illegal and violates the fundamental rights of the inhabitants of the plaintiff-State; grant permanent injunction restraining the defendant-State, from proceeding with the construction of Check Dam/diversion structure across the Pennaiyar river and its tributaries, and pumping water from them to the existing tanks in the Pennaiyar basin by the defendant-State; and other directions:

Held: Pennaiyar River water dispute has been pending consideration before this Court since the year 2018 – Multiple efforts have been undertaken by the concerned stakeholders to bring about an amicable resolution of the dispute – However, the negotiation process has not yielded any mutually acceptable outcome – In view of the inability of the parties to arrive at a common settlement, appropriate to call upon the Central Government to constitute a tribunal in terms of the statutory framework, so that the dispute may be adjudicated in accordance with law – In addition, the affidavit filed by the Union records that, during the ministeriallevel negotiations, the plaintiff-State unequivocally conveyed that the Pennaiyar River water dispute ought to be resolved through adjudication by a Tribunal and in view thereof, the defendant no.2 took a decision to indefinitely defer the negotiation process – Thus, issuance of direction to the Central Government to issue an appropriate notification in the Official Gazette and to constitute a Water Disputes Tribunal for the adjudication of the inter se water dispute between the parties, within the one month from the date of judgment. [Paras 7-10]

Keywords: Pennaiyar River · Inter-State River Pennaiyar dispute · Construction of check dam/diversion · Impeding free flow of water · Construction of Check Dam/ Anicut across Markandeyanadhi near Yargol village, Bangarapettai Taluk

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Vikram Nath, J. 1. The present suit has been instituted by the State of Tamil Nadu (hereinafter referred to as the “plaintiff-State”) invoking the original jurisdiction of this Court under Article 131 of the Constitution of India, read with Part III of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, against the State of Karnataka (hereinafter referred to as the “defendant-State”) and the Union of India (hereinafter referred to as “defendant no. 2”), praying, inter alia, the grant of the following reliefs.: (a) Declare that the unilateral action of the defendantState, in proceeding to construct/ hav
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →