LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/shipra-devi-vs-state-of-u-p-thru-addl-chief-secy-deptt-of-women-and-child-developement-lko-and-3-oth-20250801/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Constitutional · Reportable judgment

Shipra Devi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Women And Child Developement Lko And 3 Others

Court
High Court of Allahabad
Date
1 August 2025
Case No.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 960 of 2024 and PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 21609 of 2021
Result
Disposed
Bench
Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi, J. and Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi, J.
Acts & Sections
Legal Services Authority Act §1987 Constitution §226
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
These Public Interest Litigations were filed highlighting the lack of proper implementation of the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme, resulting in malnutrition among pregnant women, lactating mothers, and children aged 6 months to 6 years in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, had earlier constituted a three-member Committee to examine ground realities of implementing the Supplementary Nutrition Programme (SNP), and the Committee's report was taken on record on 07.07.2025, following which three specific questions were framed concerning the role of Self-Help Groups, the interim supply of dry ration through NAFED, and the accountability of SHGs as non-juristic entities.

The State of U.P. challenged the order dated 20.02.2025 by filing a Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court, which disposed of the same on 21.07.2025 without interfering on merits, while observing that the High Court may consider deciding the recall application first. However, the High Court, noting that the credentials of the committee members were strongly questioned by the State, chose not to rely on the committee report and instead proceeded to hear the matter on merits with the consent of all parties, rendering the recall application irrelevant.

The Court proceeded to hear substantive arguments on 23.07.2025, 24.07.2025, 28.07.2025, and 29.07.2025, focusing on issues of quantity and quality checks under the ICDS Scheme, the consonance of NAFED's interim dry ration supply with applicable law, and the collective or several accountability of SHGs for scheme implementation. The judgment text as extracted addresses the procedural history and framing of issues, with the matter being heard on merits and parties agreeing to judicial discretion on the quantum of legal fees payable to committee members.
Catchwords: Public Interest Litigation · ICDS Scheme · Integrated Child Development Services · Supplementary Nutrition Programme · malnutrition · pregnant women · lactating mothers · children · Self-Help Groups · SHG accountability · NAFED dry ration supply · committee report · recall application · Special Leave Petition · Uttar Pradesh · juristic person · quality and quality checks · U.P. State Rural Livelihood Mission · Legal Services Authority

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 24, Cited by 0] Allahabad High Court Shipra Devi vs State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. ... on 1 August, 2025 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH Reserved A.F.R Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 960 of 2024 Petitioner :- Shipra Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Women And Child Developement Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Paavan Awasthi,Bhanu Bajpai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Singh Bisht,Ram Kumar Singh AND Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 21609
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Allahabad HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →