LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/sarabjit-singh-alias-jatt-alias-aman-vs-state-of-punjab-20250421/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Criminal

Sarabjit Singh Alias Jatt Alias Aman vs State Of Punjab

Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date
21 April 2025
Case No.
CRM-M-9950-2025
Result
Allowed
Bench
Anoop Chitkara
Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §22 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §61 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §85 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §37 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §37(1)(b)(ii) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §19
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioner was arrested on 14.08.2023 in connection with FIR No. 203 registered at Model Town, District Hoshiarpur, under Sections 22, 61 and 85 of the NDPS Act, 1985, for alleged chance recovery of 15 Buprenorphine injections IP Leegesic, a commercial quantity. The petitioner sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after undergoing custody of 1 year, 7 months and 17 days as on 01.04.2025.

The High Court noted that although the commercial quantity involved triggered the twin conditions and rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, prolonged pre-trial incarceration militates against the fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. Relying on a series of Supreme Court precedents wherein bail was granted in NDPS matters involving similar contraband on account of prolonged custody and slow trial progress, the Court held that the conditional liberty of the petitioner must override the statutory embargo under Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act.

The petitioner was accordingly granted regular bail subject to stringent conditions, including a condition that if the petitioner involves himself in offences relating to commercial or intermediate quantity or offences under Sections 19, 24 or 27-A of the NDPS Act, the State would be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail in all pending NDPS FIRs against him.
Catchwords: bail · NDPS Act · commercial quantity · Buprenorphine injections · Section 37 NDPS · twin conditions · prolonged incarceration · Article 21 · fundamental rights · BNSS Section 483 · regular bail · pre-trial detention · criminal antecedents

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Filed under

NDPS Act

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 47, Cited by 0] Punjab-Haryana High Court Sarabjit Singh Alias Jatt Alias Aman vs State Of Punjab on 21 April, 2025 Author: Anoop Chitkara Bench: Anoop Chitkara CRM-M-9950-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-9950-2025 Reserved on: 02.04.2025 Pronounced on: 21.04.2025 Sarabjit Singh @ Jatt @ Aman ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. S.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Adesh Pal Singh, AAG, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. Dated Police Statio
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All P&H HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →