LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/ram-singh-vs-state-govt-of-nct-delhi-20260324/ · Printed 03 Nov 2026
Criminal

Ram Singh vs State (Govt Of Nct Delhi)

Court
Delhi High Court
Date
24 March 2026
Case No.
BAIL APPLN. 817/2026, CRL.M.A. 6279/2026
Bench
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
Acts & Sections
Bharatiya Nagarik Su §482 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanh §318(4) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanh §336(3) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanh §338 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanh §340(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanh §61(2)
Headnote AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
The petitioner Ram Singh sought anticipatory bail under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 in connection with FIR No. 322/2025 registered at P.S. Crime Branch, Delhi, for offences of cheating, forgery, criminal conspiracy and misappropriation of funds to the tune of approximately Rs. 12.04 crores. The allegations arose from a fraudulent scheme involving the purported purchase of a luxury property at DLF Camellias, Gurgaon, under the guise of a SARFAESI auction, wherein the complainant was induced to transfer large sums to co-accused persons through fabricated documents.

The petitioner contended that he was not named in the FIR, had no direct dealings with the complainant, and that his financial transactions with co-accused Mohit Gogia were in the ordinary course of his money-lending and finance business. The State opposed the grant of anticipatory bail on the basis of the petitioner's alleged role in the conspiracy and ongoing investigation against him, while all other co-accused persons had already been arrested and were in judicial custody.

The Court heard detailed submissions from senior counsel Mr. Mukul Rohatgi for the petitioner, Standing Counsel Mr. Sanjay Lao for the State, and counsel for the complainant, and proceeded to consider the matter on merits in the context of the allegations, the stage of investigation, and the principles governing the grant of pre-arrest bail.
Catchwords: anticipatory bail pre-arrest bail cheating forgery criminal conspiracy misappropriation of funds SARFAESI auction fabricated documents money-lending Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita co-accused in custody investigation pending

© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 27, Cited by 0] Delhi High Court - Orders Ram Singh vs State (Govt Of Nct Delhi) on 24 March, 2026 Author: Anup Jairam Bhambhani Bench: Anup Jairam Bhambhani $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 24th March 2026 + BAIL APPLN. 817/2026, CRL.M.A. 6279/2026 RAM SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Sharma, Mr. Avtar Singh and Ms. Ayushi Agarwal, Advocates. versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for the Stat
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

More Delhi HC — Criminal

⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →