LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/rajiv-jindal-vs-state-of-u-p-20240831/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Criminal

Rajiv Jindal vs State Of U.P.

Court
High Court of Allahabad
Date
31 August 2024
Case No.
Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 53010 of 2023
Result
Disposed
Bench
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan, J.
Acts & Sections
IPC §420 IPC §467 IPC §468 IPC §471 IPC §120B CrPC §439
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
This bunch of bail applications arose out of three FIRs registered at Police Station Noida Sector-20, District Gautam Buddh Nagar, being Case Crime Nos. 203/2023, 248/2023, and 255/2023, all under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B IPC. The applications were filed by multiple accused persons including Rajiv Jindal, Manan Singhal, Mahesh, Nand Kishore, Sumit Garg, Dolsy Murjhani, Jatin Murjani, Gaurav Singh, Amit, Akash Saini, Ajay, Vishal, Praveen Kumar, Piyush Kumar Gupta, Ashwani, Atul Gupta, and Pritam Garg, among others, all of whom were alleged to be involved in a large-scale cheating and forgery conspiracy.

The High Court of Allahabad, presided over by Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan, J., heard the consolidated batch of over fifty bail applications together given that they arose from the same set of FIRs and involved common questions of fact and law relating to allegations of cheating, forgery of valuable security, use of forged documents, and criminal conspiracy.

The Court considered the nature of allegations, the role attributed to each accused, the gravity of the offences, and the period of custody while adjudicating the individual bail applications. The judgment sets out in tabular form the details of each applicant, the case crime number, the offences alleged, and the police station concerned, providing a comprehensive overview of the multi-accused fraud matter arising out of Noida.
Catchwords: bail application · cheating · forgery · use of forged documents · criminal conspiracy · multiple accused · FIR · Noida · Gautam Buddh Nagar · IPC · bunch application

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 92, Cited by 0] Allahabad High Court Rajiv Jindal vs State Of U.P. on 31 August, 2024 Author: Manju Rani Chauhan Bench: Manju Rani Chauhan HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD AFR Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC:146622 HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Court No. - 75 CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 53010 of 2023 Rajiv Jindal ---- Applicant Vs. State of U.P. ---- Opposite Party With - Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 52966/2023, 53475/2023, 55125/2023, 55131/2023, 51907/2023, 51920/2023, 52254/2023, 53246/2023, 50362/2023, 50510/2023, 55268/2023,
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Allahabad HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →