LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/raghvendr-singh-rinku-vs-state-of-nct-of-delhi-20250107/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Criminal

Raghvendr Singh @ Rinku vs State Of Nct Of Delhi

Court
Delhi High Court
Date
7 January 2025
Case No.
BAIL APPLN. 3337/2023 & BAIL APPLN. 3400/2023
Bench
Justice Anish Dayal
Acts & Sections
IPC §302 IPC §201 IPC §380 IPC §411 IPC §120B IPC §34
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The applicant sought regular bail in two FIRs (No. 108/2019 and No. 109/2019) registered at PS Paschim Vihar (West), Delhi, arising out of the murder of a married couple, Gurmeet Singh and Jagir Kaur, whose dead bodies were found stuffed in bags in a waste drain in March 2019. The prosecution alleged that the main accused, Davinder Kaur @ Sonia and her paramour Prince Dixit @ Vikram, conspired to kill the deceased parents over a property dispute, and roped in the applicant and one Diwakar as hired accomplices for Rs. 50,000/- each. The applicant was alleged to have actively participated in smothering the first deceased and in disposing of both bodies, and articles belonging to the deceased were recovered from his residence in Lucknow.

The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated solely on the basis of the confessional statements of the main accused, which were contradictory inter se, and that he was not present in Delhi on the relevant dates. It was further submitted that the disclosure statements and alleged recoveries were unreliable and that no independent material evidence connected him to the crime. The State opposed the bail applications on the ground of the serious nature of the offences, the applicant's active role in the double murder for hire, and the recoveries made pursuant to his disclosure.

The Delhi High Court considered the submissions of both sides in the context of the twin FIRs involving charges of murder, conspiracy, and destruction of evidence against the applicant, and pronounced its judgment on 7th January 2025.
Catchwords: bail · murder for hire · criminal conspiracy · smothering · double murder · disclosure statement · recovery · Test Identification Parade · absconding accused · Indian Penal Code

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 16, Cited by 0] Delhi High Court Raghvendr Singh @ Rinku vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 7 January, 2025 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : 27th November 2024 Pronounced on : 07th January 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 3337/2023 & + BAIL APPLN. 3400/2023 RAGHVENDR SINGH @ RINKU .....Applicant Through: Mr. Pradeep Kumar Verma and Mr. B. Veeraswamy Raju, Advocates. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Anup Rana, P.S. Paschim Vihar (West). CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL JUDGMENT ANISH
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Delhi HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →