LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/prince-dixit-vikram-vs-state-20241224/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Criminal

Prince Dixit @ Vikram vs State

Court
Delhi High Court
Date
24 December 2024
Case No.
BAIL APPLN. 922/2023, BAIL APPLN. 3633/2023 & BAIL APPLN. 3554/2023
Bench
Justice Anish Dayal
Acts & Sections
IPC §302 IPC §201 IPC §380 IPC §411 IPC §120B IPC §34
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
These consolidated bail applications were filed by two applicants — Prince Dixit @ Vikram and Davinder Kaur @ Sonia — seeking regular bail in two FIRs (No. 108/2019 and 109/2019) registered at PS Paschim Vihar (West) for the alleged murder of Jagir Kaur and Gurmeet Singh, parents of applicant Davinder Kaur @ Sonia. The deceased were found dead in bags/suitcases in a waste drain in March 2019, with post-mortem reports indicating death by asphyxia due to ante-mortem smothering in both cases.

The prosecution alleged that the applicants, who were in a physical relationship, conspired to murder the deceased parents over property disputes, as the parents disapproved of their relationship. The applicants allegedly enlisted co-accused Raghvender Singh @ Rinku and one Diwakar to assist in committing the murders, with the first murder of Gurmeet Singh occurring on 17th February 2019 and the second murder of Jagir Kaur on 2nd March 2019. Various articles belonging to the deceased — including jewellery, mobile phones, motorcycles, identity documents and smothering materials — were recovered from the accused persons, and a Test Identification Parade was conducted.

The bail applications were heard and decided by a Single Judge of the Delhi High Court, who considered the nature of the offences, the gravity of the allegations, the evidence on record including recoveries and witness statements, and the conduct of the accused including their initial absconding after the commission of the alleged offences.
Catchwords: bail · murder · conspiracy · smothering · asphyxia · property dispute · absconding accused · recovery of stolen articles · Test Identification Parade · Indian Penal Code

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 23, Cited by 0] Delhi High Court Prince Dixit @ Vikram vs State on 24 December, 2024 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on : 18th October 2024 Pronounced on : 24th December 2024 + BAIL APPLN. 922/2023, BAIL APPLN. 3633/2023 & BAIL APPLN. 3554/2023 + BAIL APPLN. 922/2023 PRINCE DIXIT @ VIKRAM .....Applicant Through: Mr. Pritish Sabharwal & Mr. Sharad Pandey, Advocate. versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Ms. Shehnaz Khan, Advocate, Insp. Lakhmi Chand and Insp. Manuj Bhatia. + BAIL APPLN. 3554/2023 DAVINDE
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Delhi HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →