LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/muthyala-sunil-kumar-vs-union-of-india-ors-20240709/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Constitutional · Reportable judgment

Muthyala Sunil Kumar vs Union of India & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
9 July 2024
Case No.
Writ petition (Civil) No. 864 of 2022
Result
Disposed
Bench
Vikram Nath, Satish Chandra Sharma
Citation
[2024] 7 S.C.R. 634 : 2024 INSC 499
Acts & Sections
All-India Tourists Vehicles… Constitution All India Tourist Vehicles (Permit) Rules… Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 7 S.C.R. 634 : 2024 INSC 499
Issue for consideration
In the instant writ petitions, Petitioners-transporters and tour operators assailed the legality of different State Governments levying and collecting Authorization Fee/Border Tax, allegedly, in violation of All India Tourist Vehicles (Permit) Rules, 2023. Petitioners also prayed for refund of the Border Tax/Authorization Fee already realized by the State Authorities at the time of their vehicles entering the State.
Headnote

Inter-State transportation – All India Tourist Vehicles (Permit) Rules, 2023 – All-India Tourists Vehicles (Authorisation of Permit) Rules, 2021 – Levy and collection of Authorization Fee/Border Tax by State Governments – Petitioners are transporters and tour operators – Complaint that the State of Tamil Nadu and several other States were realizing Border Tax/Authorization Fee despite the transporters or the vehicles entering the State having already paid the requisite tax/fee under the Rules, 2023 – Tenability of:

Held: The submission advanced by the States is that the demand being raised by them is primarily under the rules framed by the respective State Governments under Entries 56 & 57 of List II of Schedule VII of the Constitution – This Court is not inclined to go into the merits of the matter at this stage, as apparently, the fundamental question to be decided would be whether levy and realization of taxes by the respective States is covered by the Act and Rules framed by the respective States under Entries 56 & 57 of List II of Schedule VII of the Constitution or not – The State enactments, rules and regulations being not under challenge, it cannot be said that the demand of Border Tax/Authorization Fee at the borders by the respective State Governments is bad under law – The petitioners, in order to succeed, have to consider challenging the State provision contained in the Act – Also, the petitioners ought to have first approached their jurisdictional High Courts to challenge their respective State enactments – Accordingly, the petitions disposed of, without interference with demands raised by the State Governments while giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the jurisdictional High Courts for their reliefs – It is made clear that this Court neither entered into the merits of the matter nor examined the same. [Paras 7, 9, 10, 11]

Read the full headnote (1 more paragraph)

All India Tourist Vehicles (Permit) Rules, 2023 – Demand of Border Tax/Authorization Fee despite the transporters or the vehicles entering the State having already paid the requisite tax/fee under the Rules, 2023 – Challenge to – Writ petitions before Supreme Court – Prayer for refund of Border Tax/Authorization Fee already realized by the State Authorities – Tenability of: Held: In the instant case, the petitions are disposed of, without interference with demands raised by the State Governments while giving liberty to the petitioners to approach the jurisdictional High Courts for their reliefs – The tax already recovered would be subject to the final outcome of the petitions that may be filed before the High Courts. [Paras 11 & 12]

Keywords: Inter-State Transport · Authorisation Fee · Border Tax · Motor Vehicles Act · Refund of Border Tax · Double Taxation · Taxation Without Legal Authority · Entries 56 & 57 of List II · Entry 35 of List II · Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India · Liberty To Approach High Court

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Bibhuti Bhushan Bose (With assistance from: Sanyam Mishra). Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Vikram Nath, J. 1. This is a batch of 117 petitions, including four contempt petitions which are de-tagged for being listed separately, filed primarily by the transporters and tour operators under Article 32 of the Constitution of India assailing the legality of different State Governments levying and collecting Authorization Fee/Border Tax in violation of All India Tourist Vehicles (Permit) Rules, 2023.1 Broadly, there are three categories of petitions but the relief claimed which is common in all the petitions, is about the levy and collection of Border Tax/Authorization Fee. 2.
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →