LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/khushal-pal-alias-prince-vs-state-of-haryana-20250325/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Criminal

Khushal Pal Alias Prince vs State Of Haryana

Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date
25 March 2025
Case No.
CRM-M-14601-2024
Result
Allowed
Bench
Anoop Chitkara
Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §22(C) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §37 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §52A CrPC §439
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR No. 216 dated 13.03.2023 registered at Police Station Sadar, Karnal, under Section 22(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for alleged possession of 1800 Alprazolam tablets weighing 225 grams, constituting a commercial quantity. The petitioner sought regular bail under Section 439 CrPC before the Punjab and Haryana High Court. The quantity involved attracted the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act, requiring the petitioner to satisfy the twin conditions prescribed thereunder.

The Court considered a series of Supreme Court precedents wherein bail had been granted in NDPS matters involving commercial quantities on the ground of prolonged pre-trial incarceration and slow progress of trial, including Chitta Biswas v. State of West Bengal (2020), Rajib Dey v. State of West Bengal (2023), Ismaul Sk v. State of West Bengal (2024), Najrul Islam @ Najbul Hoque v. State of West Bengal (2024), and Nandalal Mondal @ Abhay Mondal v. State of West Bengal (2024). The Court found that continued pre-trial incarceration would cause irreversible injustice to the petitioner and his family.

Relying on the principle that prolonged custody without conclusion of trial can itself be a ground for bail even in commercial quantity NDPS cases, the High Court allowed the bail application and directed release of the petitioner subject to appropriate terms and conditions to be fixed by the Trial Court.
Catchwords: bail · NDPS Act · commercial quantity · Alprazolam tablets · prolonged incarceration · Section 37 NDPS · twin conditions · Section 439 CrPC · pre-trial detention · narcotic drugs

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Filed under

NDPS Act

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 41, Cited by 0] Punjab-Haryana High Court Khushal Pal Alias Prince vs State Of Haryana on 25 March, 2025 Author: Anoop Chitkara Bench: Anoop Chitkara CRM-M-14601-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14601-2024 Reserved on: 12.03.2025 Pronounced on: 25.03.2025 Khushal Pal @ Prince ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aashish Bishnoi, DAG, Haryana. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 216
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All P&H HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →