LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/jagseer-singh-vs-state-of-punjab-20250220/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Criminal

Jagseer Singh vs State Of Punjab

Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date
20 February 2025
Case No.
CRM-M-65333-2024
Result
Allowed
Bench
Anoop Chitkara
Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §22(c) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §29 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §37 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §52A Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 §483 CrPC §439
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioner was arrested on 20.07.2022 pursuant to a chance recovery of 2000 tablets labelled Diazepam and 200 bottles of Codeine Phosphate syrup from his possession, attracting charges under Sections 22(c) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The quantity recovered being commercial in nature, the twin conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act were attracted, placing a heavy burden on the petitioner to secure bail. The petitioner moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking regular bail, contending that prolonged pre-trial incarceration would cause irreversible injustice to him and his family.

The Court noted that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents and placed reliance on a series of Supreme Court precedents wherein bail was granted on account of prolonged incarceration in cases involving similar contraband, namely codeine phosphate-based cough syrups seized in commercial quantities, where trials had made little or no progress. The Court observed that the principle of bail on account of delayed trial has been consistently upheld by the Supreme Court even in cases attracting the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

Having regard to the prolonged incarceration of the petitioner, the slow progress of trial, the absence of criminal antecedents, and the ratio of the Supreme Court decisions cited, the Court held that the petitioner was entitled to bail and allowed the petition subject to stringent conditions to be imposed by the Trial Court, including regular attendance and cooperation in expeditious disposal of the trial.
Catchwords: bail · NDPS Act · commercial quantity · Diazepam · Codeine Phosphate · Section 37 twin conditions · prolonged incarceration · pre-trial detention · no criminal antecedents · slow trial progress · regular bail · Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Filed under

NDPS Act

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 42, Cited by 0] Punjab-Haryana High Court Jagseer Singh vs State Of Punjab on 20 February, 2025 Author: Anoop Chitkara Bench: Anoop Chitkara CRM-M-65333-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-65333-2024 Reserved on: 17.02.2025 Pronounced on: 20.02.2025 Jagseer Singh ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Armaan Gagneja, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Adesh Pal Singh, AAG, Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 137 20.07.2022 Sad
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All P&H HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →