LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/india-media-services-private-limited-vs-sbpl-infrastructure-limited-20250924/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Civil

India Media Services Private Limited vs Sbpl Infrastructure Limited

Court
Calcutta High Court
Date
24 September 2025
Case No.
EC/231/2021, EC/255/2022, AP-COM/191/2024
Bench
Ajay Kumar Gupta
Acts & Sections
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 §34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 §14 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 §9 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 §31(6)(b) CPC §Order XXI
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioner, India Media Services Private Limited (IMSPL), filed an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking to set aside an Award dated October 27, 2020 passed by a Sole Arbitrator. The Award had allowed the counterclaim of the respondent, SBPL Infrastructure Limited, for specific performance of a Nomination Agreement dated December 5, 2005, directing the petitioner to execute a sale deed in respect of a property known as the Indian Express Building, Lower Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad, upon receipt of balance consideration of Rs. 14 crores.

The Arbitrator also awarded costs of Rs. 8,15,73,616/- with interest at 18% per annum from the date of the Award till actual payment under Section 31(6)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as it stood before the 2015 amendment. The petitioner also filed a separate application under Section 14 of the Act contending that the mandate of the Arbitrator had terminated on August 31, 2020, before the Award was published on October 27, 2020.

All connected matters, including execution proceedings filed by both parties and an application for adducing additional evidence, were heard analogously with the consent of the parties and disposed of by a common judgment.
Catchwords: Arbitration · Section 34 · setting aside award · specific performance · Nomination Agreement · mandate of arbitrator · Section 14 · execution of award · Section 9 · interim order · costs · Section 31(6)(b)

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Filed under

Arbitration and Conciliation Act Specific performance

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 96, Cited by 0] Calcutta High Court India Media Services Private Limited vs Sbpl Infrastructure Limited on 24 September, 2025 2025:CHC-OS:198 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION ORIGINAL SIDE (ASSIGNED MATTERS) Present: The Hon'ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta EC/231/2021 INDIA MEDIA SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED VS SBPL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED WITH EC/255/2022 IA NO: GA/1/2022 SBPL INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED VS INDIA MEDIA SERVICES PVT LTD. WITH AP-COM/191/2024 IA NO: GA/1/2023 INDIA MEDIA SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED VS
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Calcutta HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →