LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/in-re-t-n-godavarman-thirumulpad-vs-union-of-india-ors-20230428/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Constitutional · Reportable judgment

In Re : T. N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs Union of India & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
28 April 2023
Case No.
IA No. 3949 of 2016
Bench
Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, Vikram Nath
Citation
[2023] 6 S.C.R. 635 : 2023 INSC 442
Supreme Court Reports [2023] 6 S.C.R. 635 : 2023 INSC 442
Headnote

Environmental Laws: Mining activities beyond the distance of one kilometer from the boundary of the Protected Area, irrespective of the fact that such an area falls under the Eco-Sensitive Zone-ESZ – Permissibility of – Held: Some of the National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries, the ESZ areas are less than one kilometer, in some, it is as less as 500 meters or even less than 500 meters – Thus, it is clarified that even in case where the ESZ boundaries are less than one kilometer from the Protected Area, the ban on mining shall extend upto a distance of one kilometer from the boundary of such areas – Since the mining activity in ESZ area is a prohibited activity, even if in a particular case, the ESZ is more than one kilometer, still, if the concerned area where mining is proposed falls within the ESZ, the mining activity will not be permitted, even if it falls in an area which is beyond one kilometer from the boundary of the Protected Area.

T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India

(2010) 13 SCC 740; Goa Foundation v. Union of India and Others (2014) 6 SCC 590 : [2014] 5 SCR 302 – referred to.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by B. R. GAVAI, J. 1. When we pronounced our judgment in I.A. No. 131377 of 2022 along with connected applications in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 202 of 1995 on 26th April 2023, we did not anticipate that within a few days, we would be called upon to clarify the position as to whether mining activities would be permissible beyond the distance of one kilometer from the boundary of the Protected Area, irrespective of the fact that such an area falls under the Eco-Sensitive Zone (in short “ESZ”) notified by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Ch
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →