LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/in-re-felling-of-trees-in-aarey-forest-maharashtra-vs-in-re-felling-of-trees-in-aarey-forest-maharas-20221129/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Constitutional · Reportable judgment

In Re Felling of Trees in Aarey Forest (Maharashtra) vs In Re Felling of Trees in Aarey Forest (Maharashtra)

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
29 November 2022
Case No.
IA No. 169860 of 2022
Result
Disposed
Bench
D.Y. Chandrachud, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Citation
[2022] 14 S.C.R. 435 : 2022 INSC 1235
Supreme Court Reports [2022] 14 S.C.R. 435 : 2022 INSC 1235
Headnote

Metro Projects: Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL) – Aarey car depot for Metro Line – Court to consider as to whether it ought to permit the Tree Authority to decide application filed by MMRCL for felling of 84 trees or alternatively, whether no part of the Aarey car shed should be allowed to proceed pending the final disposal of the proceedings – Held: In projects involving large outlay of public funds, the Court cannot be oblivious to the serious dislocation which would be caused if the public investment which has gone into the project were to be disregarded – Considerations pertaining to environment are of concern because all development must be sustainable – Having regard to the entirety of the material before it, if the State Government has come to the conclusion that the original decision to allow the Metro car depot for Metro Line-3 be located at Aarey has to be restored, it would not be possible for the Court at the interim stage to stay the decision – Moreover, a substantial number of trees pertaining to the area which falls within the segment of the car shed and the ramp have already been felled – 2,144 trees were felled in executing the work pertaining to car depot, while, 212 trees were felled in connection with the work of the ramp – What is now sought is permission to apply to the Tree Authority for the felling of 84 trees pertaining to the ramp – Without a ramp the work which has already been completed would be of no consequence and would be wholly ineffective – Hence, having due regard to the circumstances, MMRCL should be permitted to pursue its application before the Tree Authority for the permission to fell 84 trees for the purpose of the ramp – However, the Tree Authority would be at liberty to take an independent decision on the application and determine what conditions, if any, should be imposed if it decides to grant its permission.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR. DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, CJI 1. On 15 April 2019, this Court, while considering Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No 31178 of 2018, declined to grant interim relief in IA No 33819 of 2019. The reliefs which were sought in the application for interim relief were in the following terms: “a) … stopping all activities being carried out by the Respondent No-4 on the land in question inside Aarey Colony; b) … directing the Respondents to carry out the activities for setting up Metro Car depot at the alternative sites referred to in para
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →