Case No.
Crl.A.(MD).Nos. 212 of 2020, 172 of 2021, 293 of 2021, 331 of 2023, 396, 397, 399 & 400 of 2023, 507 of 2023 and 94 of 2024, 534 of 2022, 551 of 2023,
Bench
K.K. Ramakrishnan J.
Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §8(c)
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §20(b)(ii)(C)
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §42
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §50
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §57
CrPC §374
Headnote
AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
These are a batch of criminal appeals filed under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure challenging convictions and sentences imposed by various Special Courts for NDPS Act Cases in Madurai and other districts of Tamil Nadu. The appellants were convicted for offences under Section 8(c) read with Section 20(b)(ii)(C) and other provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, arising out of separate crime numbers involving alleged possession and trafficking of narcotic substances, primarily ganja.
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court heard the batch of appeals together in view of the common questions of law and fact arising under the NDPS Act. The appeals arise from judgments of the II Additional Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai, the I Additional Special Court for NDPS Act Cases, Madurai, the Additional District and Sessions Court/Special Court for EC and NDPS Act Cases, Pudukkottai, and other courts, wherein the accused were sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and pay fines.
The appeals were reserved on 12.09.2025 and pronounced on 15.10.2025 by Justice K.K. Ramakrishnan. The court examined the evidence on record, compliance with mandatory provisions of the NDPS Act including Sections 42, 50, and 57, and the procedural safeguards required for valid search, seizure and sampling under the Act.
Catchwords:
NDPS Act · narcotic drugs · ganja · conviction · appeal · search and seizure · Section 8(c) · Section 20(b)(ii)(C) · mandatory compliance · rigorous imprisonment · Special Court · NIB-CID · sampling procedure · Section 42 · Section 50 · Section 57
Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's
judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.
Full Judgment Text
[Cites 104, Cited by 0]
Madras High Court
Ganesan vs The State Rep By Its on 15 October, 2025
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Reserved On : 12.09.2025
Pronounced On : 15.10.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
Crl.A.(MD).Nos. 212 of 2020, 172 of 2021, 293 of 2021, 331 of 2023,
396, 397, 399 & 400 of 2023, 507 of 2023 and 94 of 2024, 534 of 2022,
551 of 2023, 588 of 2023, 724 of 2023, 773, 953 of 2023, 265 of 2024,
322 of 2023, 269 and 558 of 2023
Crl.A.(MD).No.212 of 2020:
Ganesan ... Appellant/Sole Accused
Vs.
The State rep by its,
Th
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools.
For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.