LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/dr-jaya-thakur-ors-vs-union-of-india-anr-20240322/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Constitutional · Reportable judgment

Dr. Jaya Thakur & Ors. vs Union of India & Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
22 March 2024
Case No.
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 14 of 2024
Bench
Sanjiv Khanna, Dipankar Datta
Citation
[2024] 3 S.C.R. 881 : 2024 INSC 246
Acts & Sections
Constitution Chief Election Commissioner and other…
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 3 S.C.R. 881 : 2024 INSC 246
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to applications for stay of selection and appointment of the Election Commissioners.
Headnote

Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023 – s. 7(1) – Applications for stay of selection and appointment of the Election Commissioners in a writ petition challenging vires of s. 7(1) that substituted the Chief Justice of India with a Union Cabinet Minister nominated by the Prime Minister in the Selection Committee for the post of the Chief Election Commissioner and the ECs:

Held: Grant of stay of selection and appointment of the Election Commissioners would lead to chaos and virtual constitutional breakdown – In matters involving constitutionality of legislations, courts are cautious and show judicial restraint in granting interim orders – Unless the provision is ex facie unconstitutional or manifestly violates fundamental rights, the statutory provision cannot be stultified by granting an interim order – Stay is not ipso facto granted for mere examination or even when some cogent contention is raised – Suspension of legislation pending consideration is an exception and not the rule – Submission that this Court may by an interim order direct fresh selection with the CJI as a member of the Selection Committee, would be plainly impermissible, without declaring s. 7(1) as unconstitutional – If such submission is accepted, it would be enacting or writing a new law replacing or modifying s. 7(1), as enacted by the Parliament – Given the humongous task undertaken by the Election Commission of India, presence of two more ECs brings about a balance and check – Concept of plurality in Art. 324, is necessary and desirable – Furthermore, keeping in view the timelines for the upcoming 18th General Elections for the Lok Sabha, it is not appropriate to pass any interim order or direction – Also, EC being a constitutional post, once a constitutional post holder is selected, they are duty bound to act in accordance with the letter and spirit of the Constitution – In view thereof, prayer for grant of stay cannot be accepted and said applications dismissed. [Paras 10-16]

Keywords: Election Commissioners · Stay of selection and appointment of the Election Commissioners · Constitutionality of legislations · Judicial restraint · Interim orders · Suspension of legislation pending consideration · Violation of Fundamental Rights · CJI as a member of the Selection Committee for the post of the Chief Election Commissioner and the ECs · Election Commission of India · Concept of plurality · 18th General Elections for the Lok Sabha · Balance of convenience · Prima facie case · Irreparable injury

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Order 1. This order records reasons and decides the applications for stay of selection and appointment of the Election Commissioners1, in the writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India2, inter alia, challenging the vires of Section 7(1) of the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service, and Term of Office) Act, 2023.3 2. The primary grounds of challenge are twofold. First, Section 7(1) of the 2023 Act dilutes, if not amends or modifies, the judgment of this Court’s Constitution Bench in Anoop Baranwal v. Union of I
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →