Headnote
AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
The petitioners, Dr. Aadhar Khera and Charu Khera, filed anticipatory bail applications before the Delhi High Court arising out of FIR No. 14/2022 dated 27.01.2022 registered at PS: EOW under Sections 408/420/467/468/471/120B IPC. Their applications had been dismissed by the Sessions Court — Aadhar Khera's on 10.11.2022 and Charu Khera's on 15.01.2024. Since both applications arose from the same FIR and involved similar facts and legal issues, they were decided by a common order.
The FIR was registered on the complaint of the Director of M/s Seagull Maritime Agencies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that the accused persons, including Ajay Khera and Siddharth Khera, in connivance with certain employees, fraudulently diverted Seagull's clients and funds to newly incorporated entities — Azure Freight & Logistics LLP and Azure International LLC — by forging Bills of Lading, invoices, and other shipping documents, altering shipper names, and misusing Seagull's online credentials. The estimated wrongful loss was approximately INR 30 crores. During investigation, it was further revealed that funds from Seagull's USA operations had been illicitly transferred to Dubai-based entities and subsequently converted to cash collected in India by Ajay Khera and Aadhar Khera, estimated at INR 18–19 crores.
The petitioners contended that they had been falsely implicated. Both petitioners' names were placed in Column 12 of the charge sheet as investigation against them was continuing, though the Trial Court subsequently took cognizance against them. The High Court considered the matter on the basis of submissions by senior counsel for the respective petitioners and the State, and decided the applications by a common judgment.
Catchwords:
anticipatory bail
economic offences wing
fraud
cheating
forgery
criminal conspiracy
Bills of Lading
diversion of funds
freight forwarding
false implication
cognizance
charge sheet Column 12
© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain
per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.
Full Judgment Text
[Cites 29, Cited by 0]
Delhi High Court
Dr. Aadhar Khera vs State (Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi on 6 February, 2025
Author: Dinesh Kumar Sharma
Bench: Dinesh Kumar Sharma
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RESERVED ON - 16.12.2024
% PRONOUNCED ON - 06.02.2025
+ BAIL APPLN. 3631/2022, CRL.M.(BAIL) 1478/2022
DR. AADHAR KHERA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv. with
Mr.Sajay Abbot and Ms.Sanjana
Mihsra, Advs.
versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
.....Respondent
Through: Mr.Mukesh Kumar, APP for the
State.
Insp.Awadhesh Kr., EOW, New
Delhi
Mr.Akhil Sibh
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools.
For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.