LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/devoo-ambo-patil-sinc-decd-thr-lrs-vs-shri-hiren-venilal-sevak-partner-of-m-s-build-well-developers-20240416/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil

Devoo Ambo Patil (Sinc Decd.Thr.Lrs) vs Shri. Hiren Venilal Sevak, Partner Of M/s. Build-Well Developers

Court
Bombay High Court
Date
16 April 2024
Case No.
Second Appeal No.350 of 2022 with Second Appeal No.353 of 2022
Bench
Sandeep V. Marne, J.
Acts & Sections
Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands… §not specified TP Act §230A CPC §100
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
These Second Appeals arose from a challenge to the judgment and decree dated 15 January 2022 of the District Judge-2, Thane in Regular Civil Appeal No.188 of 2012, wherein the first Appellate Court reversed the Trial Court's dismissal of Special Civil Suit No.454 of 1994 and granted a decree for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 11 January 1988 in respect of agricultural lands bearing Survey No. 62 Hissa No.2 and Survey No. 62 Hissa No.6 at village Ovale, Taluka and District Thane. The first Appellate Court directed the original defendant-vendors to execute a conveyance deed in favour of the plaintiff and restrained them from alienating or creating third-party interests in the suit lands.

The suit property had been sold by the original defendant-vendors to M/s. Everest Land Developers on 13 May 2009 (after dismissal of the suit by the Trial Court in 1998), who was impleaded as Respondent No.10 before the first Appellate Court. Everest subsequently sold Survey No.62 Hissa No.6 to M/s. Harmony Lifestyle Structures Private Limited on 2 August 2012 during the pendency of the first appeal. Harmony was neither impleaded before the Trial Court nor the first Appellate Court but was granted leave by the High Court to file Second Appeal No.353 of 2022 challenging the impugned decree.

The central issues before the High Court included whether the plaintiff was entitled to specific performance of the unregistered agreement for sale dated 11 January 1988 for consideration of Rs.6,41,850/-, the effect of subsequent transfers to third-party purchasers including Everest and Harmony, the applicability of provisions of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 1948 and Section 230A of the Transfer of Property Act to such transactions, and whether the rights of subsequent purchasers could be affected by the decree for specific performance.
Catchwords: specific performance · agreement for sale · agricultural land · subsequent purchaser · unregistered agreement · Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act · third party rights · second appeal · impleadment · conveyance deed · permanent injunction · earnest money

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 37, Cited by 0] Bombay High Court Devoo Ambo Patil (Sinc Decd.Thr.Lrs) ... vs Shri. Hiren Venilal Sevak, Partner Of ... on 16 April, 2024 Author: Sandeep V. Marne Bench: Sandeep V. Marne 2024:BHC-AS:17550 sa_350_2022 & 353_2022_fc.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.350 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2526 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.350 OF 2022 1.Devoo Ambo Patil (since deceased) through its legal representatives Appellant Nos.2 to 6 herein 2. Ramchandra Devoo Patil 3. Pandit Shankar Devoo Patil 4. Rat
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Bombay HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find a verified advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Connect with a verified advocate on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →