LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/arun-kumar-mondal-vs-hagru-gorain-ors-20260505/ · Printed 02 Nov 2026
Civil

Arun Kumar Mondal vs Hagru Gorain & Ors

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
5 May 2026
Case No.
SA 193 of 2016
Bench
Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay
Acts & Sections
CPC §80(1) CPC §Order 7 Rule 11 Specific Relief Act, §34 West Bengal Land Ref §not specified West Bengal Estates §not specified
Headnote AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
The plaintiff/appellant instituted a second appeal seeking declaration of title and confirmation of possession over a parcel of land originally held jointly by Durgacharan and Rashbihari, who partitioned their joint holding by a registered deed dated October 13, 1931. The property subsequently passed through a chain of registered sale deeds, culminating in the plaintiff's acquisition by a registered deed of sale No.2159 dated February 23, 1983 from Tinkari Chakraborty, who had obtained a decree in Title Suit No.32 of 1980 vindicating his title against the heirs of the original co-owner.

The plaintiff's peaceful possession was disturbed on April 14, 2012 when the principal defendants claimed title through a sale deed dated January 13, 2012 executed by an alleged daughter of Tinkari Chakraborty. The plaintiff challenged this as a fraudulent, collusive, and paper transaction, contending that Tinkari Chakraborty had already divested himself of all rights in 1983 and no subsequent heir could validly alienate the property. Disputes also arose from clerical errors in settlement records, where C.S. Plot No.2816 was erroneously recorded as R.S. Plot No.3047 instead of R.S. Plot No.3057 during Revisional Settlement operations.

The defendants challenged maintainability on grounds of non-compliance with the mandatory notice requirement under Section 80(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, non-joinder of necessary parties recorded as tenants under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act in respect of R.S. Plot No.3057, and vagueness in the description of the suit property. The Trial Court framed issues on maintainability, limitation, title, identity of land, and the validity of competing claims of ownership.
Catchwords: declaration of title confirmation of possession joint ownership partition deed registered sale deed chain of title settlement errors revisional settlement record of rights fraudulent transaction Section 80 CPC pre-suit notice non-joinder of necessary parties West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act West Bengal Land Reforms Act danga land C.S. plot R.S. plot clerical error second appeal

© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 69, Cited by 0] Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side) Arun Kumar Mondal vs Hagru Gorain & Ors on 22 May, 2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE Present: The Hon'ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay SA 193 of 2016 Arun Kumar Mondal -Vs- Hagru Gorain & Ors. For the Petitioner : Mr. Bhaskar Ghosh Ms. Priyanka Jana Mr. Bikramjit Mandal Mr. Parimal Sardar For the Respondents : Mr. Animesh Mukherjee Judgment on : 05.05.2026 Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.:- 1. The plaintiff/appellant seeks a declaration of title and confirmation of po
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

More SC — Civil