LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/arif-vs-state-of-punjab-20250219/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Criminal

Arif vs State Of Punjab

Court
Punjab & Haryana High Court
Date
19 February 2025
Case No.
CRM-M-55904-2024
Result
Allowed
Bench
Anoop Chitkara
Acts & Sections
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §22 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §61 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §85 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §37 Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances… §52A Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 §483
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioner was arrested in connection with FIR No. 181 dated 13.06.2023 registered at City Kharar, District SAS Nagar, under Sections 22, 61 and 85 of the NDPS Act, 1985, arising out of a chance recovery of 45 bottles of Chlorpheniramine Maleate & Codeine Phosphate Syrup from his possession, which constituted a commercial quantity. The petitioner moved the Punjab & Haryana High Court under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for regular bail, having no criminal antecedents.

The Court held that although the commercial quantity involved attracted the twin conditions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, the petitioner was entitled to bail on account of prolonged pre-trial incarceration. The Court placed reliance on a series of Supreme Court decisions in cases involving similar contraband—codeine phosphate-containing cough syrup bottles—where bail was granted despite the rigors of Section 37, primarily on grounds of prolonged custody and slow progress of trial.

Following the judicial precedents laid down by the Supreme Court in Chitta Biswas v. State of West Bengal, Rajib Dey v. State of West Bengal, Ismaul Sk v. State of West Bengal, Najrul Islam @ Najbul Hoque v. State of West Bengal, and Nandalal Mondal @ Abhay Mondal v. State of West Bengal, the High Court allowed the bail petition, holding that further pre-trial incarceration would cause irreversible injustice to the petitioner and his family.
Catchwords: bail · NDPS Act · commercial quantity · codeine phosphate · prolonged incarceration · twin conditions · Section 37 NDPS · chance recovery · cough syrup · pre-trial detention · Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Filed under

NDPS Act

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 42, Cited by 0] Punjab-Haryana High Court Arif vs State Of Punjab on 19 February, 2025 Author: Anoop Chitkara Bench: Anoop Chitkara CRM-M-55904-2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-55904-2024 Reserved on: 17.02.2025 Pronounced on: 19.02.2025 Arif ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA Present: Mr. Yashpal Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Adesh Pal Sigh, AAG, Punjab **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 181 13.06.2023 City Kharar, 22/61/85 o
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All P&H HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →