LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/all-india-judges-association-ors-vs-union-of-india-ors-20180802/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Constitutional · Reportable judgment

All India Judges Association & Ors. vs Union of India & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
2 August 2018
Case No.
Interlocutory Application No.279 of 2010
Bench
Dipak Misra, D.Y. Chandrachud, A.M. Khanwilkar
Citation
[2018] 9 S.C.R. 419 : 2018 INSC 671
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 9 S.C.R. 419 : 2018 INSC 671
Headnote

Judiciary:

Judicial infrastructure – Importance and need for – Held: A sound infrastructure is the linchpin of a strong and stable judicial system – Access to justice and rule of law is intrinsically linked – Raising the infrastructure standards in the court complexes is the need of the hour and will go a long way in strengthening the functioning of the court and would improve the productivity in the justice delivery system – The court development plan should comprise of three components i.e. a short term (annual plan); a medium term plan (five year plan) and long term plan (ten year plan) – While focusing on judicial infrastructure, due regard has to be given to adequate and model court building, furniture, fixture, judges chamber, record/file storage, adequate sitting and recreation arrangement for staff and officers, sitting/waiting room for litigants and bar members, latest gadgets and technology – Finance needed for the court infrastructure should be placed under the head planned expenditure – The budgeting must be from the demand side and not from supply side – Directions issued to provide fundamental and vital amenities in court complexes.

All India Judges Association and Others v. Union of India and Others (2010) 14 SCC 705 ; Brij Mohan Lal v. Union of India and Others (2012) 6 SCC 502 : [2012] 5 SCR 305 – relied on.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The following Order of the Court was passed : ORDER This interlocutory application basically relates to infrastructure of the courts especially in subordinate courts. A detailed order was passed on 24.01.2011 which pertained to various projects of court buildings, residential quarters and all other aspects. On 04.04.2011, the following order came to be passed:- “By our Order dated 21st February, 2011, we had directed States of Maharashtra, Gujarat and Uttarakhand to answer five questions, which, for the sake of brevity, are reiterated hereinbelow: [1] Since when Proposals/Projects are pend
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →