LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/all-india-judges-association-and-others-vs-union-of-india-and-others-20250520/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Constitutional · Reportable judgment

All India Judges Association and Others vs Union of India and Others

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
20 May 2025
Case No.
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 1022/1989
Bench
Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai, Augustine George Masih, K. Vinod Chandran
Citation
[2025] 5 S.C.R. 1070 : 2025 INSC 735
Supreme Court Reports [2025] 5 S.C.R. 1070 : 2025 INSC 735
Issue for consideration
Matter pertains to restoration of 10% quota reserved for Limited Departmental Competitive Examination-LDCE for promotion to Higher Judicial Service-cadre of District Judge, to 25%; reduction of the minimum qualifying experience for appearing in LDCE, and if so, by how many years; percentage of reservation of quota for meritorious candidate from the Civil Judge (Junior Division) to Civil Judge (Senior Division); the minimum experience as a Civil Judge (Junior Division); calculation of the quota to be reserved for the said departmental examinations in a particular year on the cadre strength or on the number of vacancies occurring in the particular recruitment year; introduction of suitability test while promoting the Civil Judge (Senior Division) to the Cadre of District Judges against the existing 65% quota for promotion to Higher Judicial Services on the basis of merit-cum-seniority; and restoration of the requirement of having minimum three years practice for appearing in the examination of Civil Judge (Junior Division), and calculation of the same from the date of the provisional enrolment/registration or from the date of the passing of the AIBE.
Headnote

Judiciary – Higher judiciary – Promotion to Higher Judicial Service-cadre of District Judge – Quota reserved for Limited Departmental Competitive Examination-LDCE – If 10% quota reserved for LDCE for promotion to Higher Judicial Servicecadre of District Judge, to be restored to 25% as determined by this Court in ***All India Judges’ Association’s case – Consideration:

Held: Quota of reservation for LDCE for promotion from the cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division) to the Higher Judicial Service increased to 25% – If quota of LDCE is restored to 25% as originally recommended in the ***Third AIJA Case, which was reduced to 10% in the ****Fourth AIJA Case, it would provide an incentive amongst the officers in the Cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division), as also an opportunity to get accelerated promotion in the cadre of District Judge if they are meritorious and deserving – Sufficient number of Judicial Officers from the Cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division) would be available who would be eligible for appearing in LDCE – If, in a particular year sufficient candidates are not selected from the LDCE quota, it would be appropriate that such posts would revert back to the regular promotion quota based on merit-cum-seniority, to be filled up in the same year, and this would also ensure that no prejudice would be caused to the regular promotees – Also, no adverse impact on the administration of justice would occur. [Paras 24, 27, 28, 89]

Judiciary – Higher judiciary – Limited Departmental Competitive Examination-LDCE for promotion to Higher Judicial Servicecadre of District Judge – Minimum requirement of having experiance of 5 years as Civil Judge (Senior Division) for appearing in LDCE for Higher Judicial Service – Modification of requirement:

Read the full headnote (6 more paragraphs)

Held: Minimum qualifying service required to appear in the LDCE for promotion from the cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division) to the Higher Judicial Service reduced to 3 years’ service as a Civil Judge (Senior Division) – Total service required to be undertaken, including service rendered as a Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Civil Judge (Senior Division), set at a minimum of 7 years’ service – Purpose behind providing a special quota for LDCE is to enable the meritorious Judicial Officers to get accelerated promotion and enter the Cadre of District Judge at an earlier point of time than other less meritorious candidates. [Paras 40-42, 89] Judiciary – Subordinate judiciary – Promotion of Civil Judge (Junior Division) to the cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division) – Reservation of quota – Minimum experience as a Civil Judge (Junior Division) – Requirement:

Held: 10% of the posts in the Cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division) be reserved for accelerated promotion of Civil Judge (Junior Division) candidates through LDCE mechanism – Minimum experience of a Judicial Officer in the Cadre of Civil Judge (Junior Division) for appearing in such an examination should be 3 years – Said system introduced so as to provide incentive at an earlier promotion to the meritorious candidates working in the Cadre of Civil Judge (Junior Division) – Said seats would be filled up through the same mechanism adopted for filling up the vacancies reserved through LDCE for entry into the Cadre of District Judge. [Paras 46, 89]

Judiciary – Subordinate judiciary – Quota reserved for Limited Departmental Competitive Examination-LDCE for promotion of Civil Judge (Junior Division) to the cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division) – If calculated on cadre strength or number of vacancies occurring in a particular recruitment year: Held: Keeping uniformity in view, quota to be reserved for LDCE to be calculated on the basis of the cadre strength. [Paras 48, 89] Judiciary – Higher judiciary – Promotion to Higher Judicial Services – Promotion of Civil Judge (Senior Division) to the Cadre of District Judges against the existing 65% quota – Suitability test – Requirement:

Held: While providing a rule for determining the suitability of a candidate, it would be relevant to consider factors: whether the candidate possesses updated knowledge of law, quality of judgments rendered by the judicial officer, ACRs of preceding five years, disposal rate in the preceding five years; performance of the judicial officer in viva voce, and general perceptions and awareness as also communication skills – Though every High Court required to frame rules for determining the suitability of a candidate for being promoted to the Cadre of Higher Judicial Service from the Cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division), no straight-jacket formula can be laid down for the said purpose – In States where rules not framed, such of the High Courts and the State Governments to frame the Rules forthwith – High Courts and the State Governments to also examine, as to whether the Rules already existing are sufficient to determine the suitability of a candidate. [Paras 52, 89] Judiciary – Subordinate judiciary – Post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) – Requirement of minimum three years practice for appearing in the examination of Civil Judge (Junior Division) – If to be restored – Minimum years of practice, to be calculated from date of provisional enrolment/registration or date of passing AIBE:

Held: Candidates desirous of appearing in the examination for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) must have practiced for a minimum period of 3 years to be eligible for the said examination – Candidate to produce a certificate either by the Principal Judicial Officer of that Court or by an advocate of that Court having a minimum standing of 10 years duly endorsed by the Principal Judicial Officer of such a District or a Principal Judicial Officer at such a station – Candidates practicing before the High Courts or this Court, to be certified by an advocate who has a minimum standing of 10 years duly endorsed by officer designated by that High Court or this Court – Experience of the candidates which they have gained while working as Law Clerks with any of the Judges or Judicial Officers in the country to be considered while calculating their total number of years of practice – Rules also mandate that the candidates appointed to the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) pursuant to their selection through the examination must compulsorily undergo at least 1 year of training before presiding in a Court – Number of years of practice completed by a candidate desirous of appearing in the examination for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) be calculated from the date of their provisional enrolment/registration with the concerned State Bar Council – Furthermore, the requirement of minimum years of practice not applicable in cases where the concerned High Court has already initiated the selection process for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) prior to the date of this judgment and shall be applicable only from the next recruitment process. [Para 81-89] Directions by the Supreme Court – Directions as regards qualification, promotion and selection of candidates desirous of entering the Judicial Services as Civil Judge (Junior Division) or Higher Judicial Service, and promotions at different levels within the Judicial Services:

Held: High Courts and State Governments to amend relevant service rules to effect the quota of reservation for LDCE for promotion from the cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division) to the Higher Judicial Service is increased to 25%; minimum qualifying service required to appear in the LDCE for promotion from the cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division) to Higher Judicial Service be reduced to 3 years’ service as Civil Judge (Senior Division); total service required to be undertaken including service rendered as Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Civil Judge (Senior Division), be set at minimum of 7 years’ service; 10% of the posts in the Cadre of Civil Judge (Senior Division) be reserved for accelerated promotion of Civil Judge (Junior Division) candidates through LDCE mechanism; vacancies for LDCE be calculated on basis of cadre strength; candidates appearing in the examination for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) must have practiced for minimum period of 3 years to be eligible for the examination; and number of years of practice completed by candidate appearing in the examination for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) be calculated from the date of their provisional enrolment/registration with the concerned State Bar Council. [Para 89]

Keywords: Judiciary · Judicial service · Limited Departmental Competitive Examination · Minimum qualifying experience for appearing in LDCE · Meritorious candidate · Promotion quota based on meritcum-seniority · Minimum three years practice for appearing in the examination of Civil Judge · First National Judicial Pay Commission · Shetty Commission · Incentive to meritorious judicial officers · Accelerated promotion · Cadre strength · Establishment of judicial academy · Law Commission of India 117th Report

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Nidhi Jain. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

INDEX* I. PREFACE ....................................................................................... II. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ...................................................... III. DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS ...................................................... Issue No.1: As to whether the 10% quota reserved for Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (for short, ‘LDCE’) for promotion to Higher Judicial Service i.e. cadre of District Judge, needs to be restored to 25% as determined by this Court in the case of All India Judges’ Association and others v. Union of India and
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →