LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/yogesh-makkar-vs-the-state-govt-nct-of-delhi-20240426/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Criminal

Yogesh Makkar vs The State (Govt. Nct Of Delhi)

Court
Delhi High Court
Date
26 April 2024
Case No.
BAIL APPLN. 3517/2023
Bench
Jyoti Singh
Acts & Sections
CrPC §439 CrPC §482 CrPC §161 IPC §409 IPC §420 IPC §120B
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
The petitioner Yogesh Makkar, Head of Demat/Depository Service Department of M/s. Modex International Securities Ltd. (MISL), filed a bail application under Section 439 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in FIR No. 195/2020 registered at PS: Economic Offences Wing under Sections 409/420/120B IPC. The FIR was registered on a complaint alleging that MISL and its officials, including the applicant, induced complainants to open Demat/trading accounts with MISL, transferred their shares and securities to MISL's pool/margin accounts, traded without authorisation, and misappropriated the proceeds, causing wrongful loss to the complainants.

During investigation, 50 additional complainants filed similar complaints which were clubbed in the present FIR. Forensic audit by KPMG and inspection by NSE revealed misappropriation of funds to the tune of approximately Rs.136.29 crores. MISL had received net cash settlements of Rs.126.31 crores from exchanges against sale and purchase of clients' securities but failed to transfer the proceeds to its clients. The applicant was alleged to be one of the key officials who approached and induced complainants to open accounts and was instrumental in the fraudulent scheme.

The Delhi High Court considered the bail application of the petitioner in the context of the serious financial fraud involving multiple complainants and large-scale misappropriation of client securities and funds by MISL and its officials.
Catchwords: bail application · economic offences · criminal breach of trust · cheating · criminal conspiracy · Demat accounts · share misappropriation · securities fraud · broker fraud · forensic audit · MISL · pool accounts · margin accounts

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Filed under

Quashing of FIR (Section 482 CrPC / 528 BNSS)

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 19, Cited by 0] Delhi High Court - Orders Yogesh Makkar vs The State (Govt. Nct Of Delhi) on 26 April, 2024 Author: Jyoti Singh Bench: Jyoti Singh $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 3517/2023 YOGESH MAKKAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil Dalal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rohit Kheriwal, Mr. Nikhil Beniwal, Ms. Manisha Saroha, Mr. Navish Bhati, Mr. Anutosh and Mr. Ghayasuddin, Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT. NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State with Insp. Sandeep Maan, PS: EOW. CORAM: HON'BLE MS.
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Delhi HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →