LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/vinod-mahabiprasad-gupta-vs-saidpur-jute-co-ltd-and-ors-20241112-2/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Civil

Vinod Mahabiprasad Gupta vs Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd. And Ors

Court
Bombay High Court
Date
12 November 2024
Case No.
Civil Revision Application No. 120 of 2023 and Civil Revision Application No. 215 of 2023 with Interim Application No. 15717 of 2023
Bench
Sandeep V. Marne
Acts & Sections
TP Act §108 TP Act §108(o)
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
These Civil Revision Applications were filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the judgment and order dated 12 January 2023 passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court, which dismissed Appeal Nos. 396/2015 and 95/2016 and confirmed the eviction decree dated 25 June 2015 passed by the Small Causes Court in R.A.E. Suit No. 147A/306 of 1996. The eviction decree directed the Revision Applicants (Defendant Nos. 1 to 8) to hand over possession of Godown No. 63, Sitaram Mill, Delisle Road, Mumbai to the Plaintiff-Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd.

The Plaintiff had instituted the suit against Defendant No. 1-MBK Enterprises, the original lessee under a 60-year lease dated 2 July 1975, alleging unlawful subletting of the suit premises to Defendant No. 2-Mid-Day Publications Pvt. Ltd., commission of acts contrary to Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, and carrying out structural additions and alterations of a permanent nature without the written permission of the Plaintiff. Defendant No. 1 contended that the lease covenants entitled it to grant a sublease, and that the premises had been subleased to associate companies which in turn had given the premises on licence to Mid-Day Publications.

The Small Causes Court framed issues including whether Defendant No. 1 had unlawfully sublet the suit premises, whether structural additions and alterations of a permanent nature had been carried out, whether acts of waste contrary to Section 108(o) of the Transfer of Property Act had been committed, and whether the court had jurisdiction to entertain the suit. After a full trial, the Small Causes Court decreed the suit for possession, which decree was confirmed by the Appellate Bench, leading to the present revision applications before the High Court.
Catchwords: civil revision · eviction · unlawful subletting · lease · sublease · Transfer of Property Act · Small Causes Court · structural alterations · possession · landlord and tenant

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 37, Cited by 0] Bombay High Court Vinod Mahabiprasad Gupta vs Saidpur Jute Co. Ltd. And Ors on 12 November, 2024 2024:BHC-AS:43352 Neeta Sawant CRA-120-2023-CRA-215-2023-FC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 120 OF 2023 1. M.B.K. Enterprises 2. M/s. Mangla International Pvt. Ltd. 3. M/s. Shubh Mangal Finvest Pvt. Ltd. 4. M/s. Marve Beach Realtors Pvt. Ltd. 5. M/s. Garden View Realtors Pvt. Ltd. 6. M/s. Dahlia Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd } ....Applicants (Appellants in Appeal/ Org. Def Nos. 1 & 3 to 7
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All Bombay HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →