LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/union-of-india-anr-vs-avtar-chand-etc-etc-20190219/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

Union of India & Anr. vs Avtar Chand etc. etc.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
19 February 2019
Case No.
Civil Appeal Nos.3416-3445 of 2010
Result
Allowed
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, L. Nageswara Rao
Citation
[2019] 4 S.C.R. 577 : 2019 INSC 225
Supreme Court Reports [2019] 4 S.C.R. 577 : 2019 INSC 225
Headnote

Compensation: Claim of – Award of 200% compensation – Justification of – On facts, non-payment of minimum wages to workmen – Order by the Specified Authority directing the employers to pay to each worker the difference in wages towards the claim plus compensation at the rate of 200% of the claim – High Court upheld the order – On appeal, held: In an identical case, the High Court awarded 100% compensation to similarly placed workers, thus, there was no justification to award compensation at the rate of 200% to the workers – Though it was the discretion of the Courts/Authority to award compensation with different percentage in every case but it was necessary to give reasons in support thereof – High Court failed to give reasons – Thus, each worker entitled to claim compensation at the rate of 100% in place of 200% – Labour Laws.

Allowing the appeals, the Court

HELD: 1.1 The High Court, in the instant case also should have awarded compensation at the rate of 100% to each respondent alike the one awarded in other case which had attained finality. There is no justification to award compensation at the rate of 200% to the respondents when in other identical case, the High Court awarded compensation at the rate of 100% to similarly placed workers. [Paras 16, 17] [580-D-E]

1.2 Though, it was the discretion of the Courts/Authority to award compensation with different percentage in every case but it was necessary to give reasons in support of award of such compensation. It was much more so when the High Court awarded compensation at the rate of 200% to some workers and awarded at the rate of 100% to other workers though similarly situated. This necessitated for giving of reasons as to why compensation was being awarded at the rate of 200% to one set of workers as against the other set of workers at the rate of 100% when all were similarly placed. The High Court failed to give any reason while awarding compensation at two rates. The impugned order is modified to the extent that each respondent-worker is held entitled to claim compensation amount at the rate of 100%, i.e., Rs.49,804/- in place of 200% which was awarded by the Courts below. Each respondent-worker is held entitled to receive a sum of Rs.49,804/- (100%) towards his claim plus Rs.49,804/- by way of compensation = total Rs.99,608/-. [Paras 18-20][580-F-H; 581-A-B]

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. These appeals are directed against the final judgment and order dated 01.03.2007 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Writ Petition Nos. 3126, 3128, 3129, 3130, 3132, 3133-3145, 3148-3151 and 3153-3161 of 2007 whereby the High Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by the appellants herein. 2. A few facts need mention infra for the disposal of these appeals which involve a short point. 3. The appellant No.1 is the Union of India (Commander, Western Base Workshop, General Reserve Engineers Force
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →