Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 23514 of 2017
Acts & Sections
Electricity Act, 200 §2(27)
Electricity Act, 200 §14
Electricity Act, 200 §17
Electricity Act, 200 §111
Electricity Act, 200 §125
Electricity Act, 200 §128
Headnote
AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
The appellant, Torrent Power Limited, was appointed as a Distribution Franchisee by Dakshinanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited (DVVNL) under a Distribution Franchisee Agreement dated 18.05.2009 and a Supplementary Agreement dated 17.03.2010 for distribution of electricity in the urban area of Agra. Respondent No. 4 filed a petition before the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission (UPERC) challenging the legality and validity of the said agreements, alleging that prior approval of the UPERC had not been sought for the transfer of utility to the appellant, in violation of Section 17 of the Electricity Act, 2003. The appellant raised preliminary objections as to jurisdiction and maintainability, which were dismissed by the UPERC on grounds of public interest. The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (APTEL) affirmed the UPERC's order, dismissing the appellant's appeal under Section 111 of the Act, 2003.
The Supreme Court, in this statutory appeal under Section 125 of the Electricity Act, 2003, examined three principal questions: (i) whether Electricity Regulatory Commissions (ERCs) have jurisdiction to consider matters in public interest; (ii) whether the petition filed by respondent No. 4 under Section 128 of the Act, 2003 was maintainable in law; and (iii) whether ERCs have jurisdiction to review the functioning of a distribution licensee supplying electricity through a franchisee. The Court undertook a detailed analysis of the relevant provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, including Sections 14, 17, 111, 125, and 128.
The judgment addresses the scope of regulatory jurisdiction of Electricity Regulatory Commissions under the Electricity Act, 2003, the maintainability of petitions by persons who are not consumers, and the extent of oversight that ERCs may exercise over distribution licensees and their franchisee arrangements in the public interest.
Catchwords:
Electricity Act 2003
Distribution Franchisee Agreement
UPERC jurisdiction
public interest
distribution licensee
franchisee
Section 17
Section 14
Section 111
Section 125
Section 128
APTEL
maintainability
Agra
Torrent Power
DVVNL
regulatory commission
© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain
per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.