LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/the-state-of-nagaland-ors-vs-nishevi-achumi-20220711/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

The State of Nagaland & Ors. vs Nishevi Achumi

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
11 July 2022
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 4223 of 2022
Result
Allowed
Bench
M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna
Citation
[2022] 7 S.C.R. 592 : 2022 INSC 695
Supreme Court Reports [2022] 7 S.C.R. 592 : 2022 INSC 695
Headnote

Service Law – Family pension – Claim of – Husband of the respondent-wife died in harness as work-charge employee in the year 2005 – In the year 2017 i.e. after period of twelve years from the death of deceased employee, the respondent-wife filed a writ petition and claimed the services of her late husband ought to have been regularized and therefore she is entitled to family pension – Single Judge of the High Court directed the State to regularize the services of respondent’s husband one day prior to his demise so that respondent gets entitled to pensionary benefits – Aggrieved, State filed appeal before the Division Bench of the High Court, which was dismissed – On appeal, held: Deceased employee never claimed any regularization during his lifetime – Respondent claimed regularization twelve years from the death of the deceased employee – At the time of death, the employee was much below in the seniority list of work charge employees whose services were to be regularised – High Court committed error in issuing direction to regularise the services of the deceased employee one day prior to his death – Judgment and order of High Court unsustainable and set aside.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by M. R. SHAH, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned Judgment and Order dated 19.04.2021 passed by the High Court of Gauhati at Kohima in Writ Appeal No.21 of 2019 by which the Division Bench of the High Court has dismissed the said appeal and has confirmed the judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge directing the appellant – State to regularize the services of the deceased husband of the respondent from one day earlier to his death and thereafter to pay the family pension to the Respondent, the State has preferred th
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →