LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/the-state-of-kerala-anr-vs-gouri-ors-20180925/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

The State of Kerala & Anr. vs Gouri & Ors.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
25 September 2018
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 7694 of 2009
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Abhay Manohar Sapre, S. Abdul Nazeer
Citation
[2018] 12 S.C.R. 682 : 2018 INSC 869
Supreme Court Reports [2018] 12 S.C.R. 682 : 2018 INSC 869
Headnote

Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971: s.3(3) – The land in question was acquired by the respondents prior to the appointed day and was being used for personal cultivation by respondents – Therefore, respondents-land owners were entitled to exemption of their land from being vested in the State under the Act – Land Acquisition.

Dismissing the appeal, the Court

HELD: 1. The High Court held that the land was acquired by the respondents (landowners) prior to the appointed day and was being used for personal cultivation by the respondentslandowners. These findings were recorded on the basis of the commissioner’s report, who made on the spot inspection of the land in presence of both the parties. No kind of any perversity or arbitrariness or illegality is noticed in these findings. These findings were rendered in conformity with the law laid down by this Court in *Joseph case. The High Court, therefore, rightly held that the respondents are entitled to claim exemption of their land in question. [Paras 7, 8] [684-B-C, D]

*Joseph & Anr. v. State of Kerala & Anr. (2007) 10 SCC 414 : [2007] 6 SCR 347 – relied on.

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the State against the final judgment and order dated 10.08.2007 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in M.F.A. No.297 of 2001 whereby the High Court allowed the MFA filed by the respondents herein (land owners) and set aside the order of the Forest Tribunal. 2. Few facts for the disposal of this appeal need mention hereinbelow. 3. At the outset, we consider it apposite to mention that this appeal was heard analogously with the Civil Appeal No.9912/2010 because the c
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →