LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/t-i-jose-and-ors-vs-managing-director-kerala-water-authority-and-anr-20190213/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

T. I. Jose and Ors. vs Managing Director, Kerala Water Authority and Anr.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
13 February 2019
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 4676 of 2012
Result
Dismissed
Bench
D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta
Citation
[2019] 4 S.C.R. 610 : 2019 INSC 190
Supreme Court Reports [2019] 4 S.C.R. 610 : 2019 INSC 190
Headnote

Service Law:

Pay scale – Of the post of Head Operators in the respondent department – In the line of promotional posts viz. ‘Operator’, ‘Head Operator’ and ‘Mechanical Superintendent’, a post of ‘Senior Operator’ was inserted between the posts of ‘Operator’ and ‘Head Operator’ by an administrative order – Decision of creation of the intermediate post was set aside by High Court – Pursuant to the order of High Court, State deleted the post of ‘Senior Operator’ and refixed the scales of pay corresponding to the existing prerevised scales of pay – Review petition by the respondent-Authority dismissed – Writ appeals allowed by Division Bench of High Court – In review High Court held that there shall be no recovery of amounts already disbursed to the employees or pensioners of the respondent- Authority – On appeal, held: The higher pay scale which was given to Head Operators was occasioned by creation of an intermediate post of Senior Operators – Once the intermediate post was abolished since it was found to be ultra vires by the High Court, the pay scale of Head Operators was restored to the exactly corresponding pay scale under the revised scales of pay – This action was consistent with law.

Dismissing the appeal, the Court

Read the full headnote (1 more paragraph)

HELD: On the analysis of the pay revision, it has emerged before the Court that Head Operators were drawing a pre-revised scale of Rs 1455-2440. The equivalent revised scale of pay under the third pay revision was Rs 4710-7710. Since an intermediate post of Senior Operator was created by an administrative decision, the scale of pay for that post was fixed at the pay scale allowable to the next higher post of Head Operator. Consequently, the pay scale for the post of Head Operator was made equivalent to that which was drawn in the next higher post of Mechanical Superintendent. The High Court held that an intermediate post could not have been created by an administrative order and would require an amendment to the statutory rules. Following this, the State Government in its GO dated 18 March 2004 abolished the intermediate post. Upon the abolition of the intermediate post, all that was done by the GO dated 18 March 2004 was to clarify that Operators, Head Operators and Mechanical Superintendents would be entitled to draw equivalent revised scales of pay corresponding to their pre-revised pay scales. The higher pay scale which was given to Head Operators under note 13 was occasioned by the creation of an intermediate post of Senior Operators. Once the intermediate post was abolished since it was found to be ultra vires by the High Court, the pay scale of Head Operators was restored to the exactly corresponding pay scale under the revised scales of pay. This action was consistent with law. The High Court has fairly issued a direction that no recoveries shall be made. [Paras 13,14,15] [615-C-H; 616-C]

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DR DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, J. 1. This appeal arises from a judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Kerala dated 16 November 2004. 2. The appellants were working at the material time as Head Operators and Operators under the Kerala Water Authority1, a statutory KWA body established by the State of Kerala on 1 April 1984. KWA implemented three pay revisions: (i) The first pay revision was on 13 February 1990, with effect from 1 July 1988; (ii) The second pay revision was on and with effect from 24 April 1995; and (iii) The third pay
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →