Public Interest Litigation: Instant matter was registered as PIL by High Court – Therefore, it ought to be dealt with as a nonadversarial litigation – Respondent in the instant appeal, who is said to have brought certain facts to the notice of the High Court, is, otherwise, standing in the capacity of a disputant qua the appellants – That being the position, the observations made in paragraph 17 of the order impugned, where the High Court has permitted the respondent to assist the Court and thereby has practically assigned him the role of an amicus, do not appear compatible with the requirements of a PIL – Therefore, paragraph
17 of the impugned order is annulled – In other words, the matter is left open to be dealt with as a PIL; and all the relevant aspects of the matter are left open for the examination by the High Court with the assistance of amicus curiae, who has also been appointed in terms of paragraph 18 of the order impugned.
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.