LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/state-of-punjab-ors-vs-m-s-punjab-spintex-ltd-20240715/ · Printed 07 Nov 2026
Civil · Reportable judgment

State of Punjab & Ors. vs M/s Punjab Spintex Ltd.

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
15 July 2024
Case No.
Civil Appeal No. 10970-10971 of 2014
Result
Allowed
Bench
Vikram Nath, Prashant Kumar Mishra
Citation
[2024] 7 S.C.R. 745 : 2024 INSC 526
Acts & Sections
Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act… Punjab Rural Development Act, 1987
Supreme Court Reports [2024] 7 S.C.R. 745 : 2024 INSC 526
Issue for consideration
Whether the exemption from payment of Market Fee, granted under the Industrial Policy, 2003, of the Punjab Government, can be said to include exemption from Rural Development Fee.
Headnote

Market Fees – Scope of Exemption in relation to fees collected under two different statutes – Explained:

Held: The preamble of the Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, which governs the collection of market Fee, clearly stipulates that it is a statute to provide for law relating to better regulation of purchase, sale, storage and processing of agricultural produce and for establishment of markets in the State – Whereas, the Punjab Rural Development Act, 1987, which governs the collection of Rural Development Fee, on the other hand, is enacted for providing relief for the loss of agricultural produce, accelerating rural development, improve facilities for purchasers of agricultural produce and augment agricultural production – It is not uncommon for different statutes, concerning similar area of law, to have convergence of interests to some degree – However, this would not imply that benefits extended to one statute will be presumed to flow to the other statute as well – The 2003 Policy does not specifically exempt Rural Development fees – Any contrary interpretation would considerably broaden the canvas of the incentives available under the 2003 Policy, which was never intended – The interpretation that exemption from Market fees is inclusive of Rural Development fees shall be contrary to the statutory provisions and objective behind both the Acts as well as the 2003 Policy – Hence, the Market Fee and the Rural Development Fee cannot be equated or assumed to be same or similar for the purposes of exemption. [Paras 20 to 24]

Keywords: Market Fee · Rural Development Fee

As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Headnotes prepared by: Prastut Mahesh Dalvi, Hony. Associate Editor (Verified by: Shadan Farasat, Adv.). Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.

Full Judgment Text

Judgment Vikram Nath, J. 1. These appeals, by special leave, assail the correctness of the judgment and orders dated 27.01.2010 and 24.09.2010 passed by the Punjab & Haryana High Court, respectively in Civil W.P. No. 14847 of 2009 and C.M. No. 3144 of 2010 in the Writ Petition. 2. The matter pertains to exemption from payment of Market fee and Rural Development fee sought by the Respondent herein. The Respondent company was incorporated on 26.12.2006 and set up a spinning unit at Bathinda for manufacturing cotton yarn out of raw cotton. Thereafter, the Respondent company applied to the Appe
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All SC judgments →