LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/smt-prameela-pasumarthi-vs-the-deputy-commissioner-of-income-tax-20240712-2/ · Printed 10 Nov 2026
Revenue

Smt Prameela Pasumarthi vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court
Andhra Pradesh High Court
Date
12 July 2024
Case No.
Writ Petition Nos. 14681, 14678, 14852, 28520, 29758, 29980, 21645, 31762, 32056, 32074, 32364, 32366, 32368, 32488, 32489, 22740, 33047, 33089, 39229
Result
Disposed
Bench
G. Narendar J and Hiranmayee Mandava J
Acts & Sections
Constitution §226 Constitution §14 Constitution §19(1)(g) Constitution §265 Income Tax Act, 1961 §148 Income Tax Act, 1961 §148A
Also reported in
This judgment disposed of connected matters. The same reasons were delivered in the following 9 cases.
Mr. Kishan Kumar Thotakura vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Writ Petition Nos. 14681, 14678, 14852, 28520, 29758, 29980, 21645, 31762, 32056, 32074, 32177, 32175, 32156, 32364, 32366, 32368, 32488, 32489, 22740
Smt Prameela Pasumarthi vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Writ Petition Nos. 14681, 14678, 14852, 28520, 29758, 29980, 21645, 31762, 32056, 32074, 32177, 32175, 32156, 32364, 32366, 32368, 32488, 32489, 22740
Spartek Ceramics India Limited vs The Additional Joint Deputy Assistant ...
Mrs.Nusrat Shazia, vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 141,
Andhra Pradesh State Handloom Weavers ... vs The National Faceless Assessment ...
M/S The Andhra Pradesh High Court ... vs Assessment Unit,
Viraj Gopal Appa Rao Meka vs The National Faceless Assessment ...
Venkata Raja Srinivas Bommidala vs Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Venkata Sai Krishna Maddi vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Income ...
Headnote AI-drafted · Reviewed and approved
These writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati challenging orders passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for various assessment years. The petitioners, individual assessees from Andhra Pradesh, assailed the impugned orders and notices as arbitrary, illegal, bad in law, void ab initio and violative of principles of natural justice, as well as violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India and Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioners sought a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the said orders under Section 148A(d) and the consequent notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as illegal and void. The challenges were directed against various Income Tax Officers and the Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.

The Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh heard the batch of writ petitions together as they involved common questions of law and fact relating to the validity of reopening of assessments under the amended provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Catchwords: income tax reassessment · Section 148 notice · Section 148A(d) order · reopening of assessment · writ of mandamus · Article 226 · natural justice · arbitrary action · void ab initio · assessment year

Headnote © LegalFirms.in. Section 52(1)(q)(iv) of the Copyright Act, 1957 allows a court's judgment to be reproduced unless the court has prohibited it.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 44, Cited by 0] Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Between vs A Wen On In Rd : A Sea on 12 July, 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION} FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY GF JULY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR 'PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE G.NARENDAR AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION Nos. 14681, 14678, 14852, 28520, 29758, 29980, 21645, 31762, S805, $2056, 32074, QQ177, J21FS, SPISG, 32364, 32366, 32368, 32488, 32489, 22740, 33047, 33089, 329279, 39229, 99232, 39647 of 2023 and 4285, 4282, 4296, 4340, 4901, 4
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
Annual plans from ₹1,599 + GST.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

All AP HC judgments →
⚖ LegalFirms.in Directory
Find an advocate for this matter
Dealing with a similar case? Find an advocate who handles this kind of matter on LegalFirms.in.
Find an Advocate →