LegalFirms.in
LegalFirms.in Judgments · legalfirms.in/judgments/sh-pradeep-and-ors-vs-state-n-c-t-of-delhi-and-anr-20240801/ · Printed 04 Jul 2026
Criminal

Sh. Pradeep And Ors vs State(N.C.T Of Delhi) And Anr

Court
Supreme Court of India
Date
1 August 2024
Case No.
CRL.M.C. 1355/2022
Result
Disposed
Bench
Subramonium Prasad
Acts & Sections
IPC §498A IPC §406 IPC §34 Hindu Marriage Act, §13B CrPC §482
Headnote AI-drafted · Editorially reviewed
The Petitioners filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No. 382/2015 registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar for offences under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 IPC on the ground that the parties had arrived at a mediation settlement before the Counselling Cell, Family Court, Delhi. The Settlement Deed dated 14.10.2019 was made part of the divorce decree dated 19.11.2019 passed under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act. However, Respondent No. 2 (wife) was not prepared to proceed with the settlement on the ground that no provision had been made for maintenance of the child born from the wedlock.

The Delhi High Court referred the parties to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre for further mediation, but the attempt to arrive at an amicable settlement failed. The Court noted that the settlement deed did not provide for any maintenance of the child, a matter the Apex Court has consistently held to be of paramount importance, and that the rights of a minor child cannot be extinguished by a settlement between the parents.

The Court proceeded to examine whether the FIR could be quashed in light of the matrimonial settlement, taking into account the interests of the minor child and the principles governing quashing of FIRs in matrimonial disputes where offences are non-compoundable but parties have settled their differences.
Catchwords: quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC mediation settlement Hindu Marriage Act Section 13B mutual consent divorce child maintenance minor child welfare non-compoundable offences inherent powers settlement deed

© LegalFirms.in — Headnote is proprietary. Raw judgment text is in the public domain per Section 52(1)(p) of the Copyright Act, 1957.

Full Judgment Text

[Cites 12, Cited by 0] Delhi High Court - Orders Sh. Pradeep And Ors vs State(N.C.T Of Delhi) And Anr on 1 August, 2024 Author: Subramonium Prasad Bench: Subramonium Prasad $~97 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 1355/2022 SH. PRADEEP AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vijay Datt Gahtori, Mr. Tara Singh Bisht, Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Mr. S.N. Ranga, Mr. Pradeep Kumar and Mr. Asutosh Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE(N.C.T OF DELHI) AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. Mr. Faraz Maqbool, Ms. Sana Juneja & Mr. Chandan Kuma
Full text available to subscribers
Subscribe to access complete judgment text, daily digests, and AI-powered legal research tools. For informational and research purposes only.
View Subscription Plans →
From ₹167/month.

This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.

More SC — Criminal