Service Law:
Resignation – Acceptance of – Whether required – Appointment of appellant-employee – There was bond to serve for a minimum period of five years – After the bond period was over, appellant served notice for resignation to take effect after expiry of 30 days period – After the notice period was over, the employee when approached the employer for release of his pending dues – Employer asked the employee to report for duty as his resignation was not accepted – Writ petition challenging the order of employer – Dismissed by High Court – On appeal, Held: Service conditions of the employee are governed by Certified Standing Orders framed under Certifying Officer Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 – In the Standing Order 18 there is no provision for acceptance of resignation – A permanent employee has a right to resign from the services by giving a notice of the period of 30 days – There is no other Standing Order or rule which puts a fetter on an employee to resign or confers power on the employer to reject a resignation – The bond period of 5 years was already over – The resignation became effective on the lapse of 30 days period – To resign is right of an employee who cannot be forced to serve in case he is not willing until and unless there is stipulation in the Rules or in the terms of appointment or disciplinary proceeding is pending or contemplated which is sought to be avoided by resigning from the services – The order of the employer declining to accept the resignation are quashed – Appeals allowed.
Punjab National Bank v. P.K.Mittal (1989) Supp. (2) SCC 175 : [1989] 1 SCR 612; State of U.P. v. Achal Singh (2018) 10 SCALE 89; Dinesh Chandra Sangma v. State of Assam. (1977) 4 SCC 441 : [1978] 1 SCR
607 – relied on.
Moti Ram v. Param Dev and Anr. (1993) 2 SCC 725 : [1993] 2 SCR 250 – distinguished.
As published in the Supreme Court Reports, Supreme Court of India. Text from the Indian Supreme Court Judgments open data set (Dattam Labs), CC BY 4.0.
This page is for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for advice specific to your situation.